why does the government give welfare to people who have kids they can't afford?

Answer 1

Because having kids is what keeps them from having to work. This is not always the case though. There are cases, more frequently than you may think, where the government is only supplementing their income since their job doesn't pay enough to support all of the kids. It's the eternal question of 'why are you still breeding?' that needs to be addressed. Good question!!

Answer 2

Socialism. It's actually making the problem worse because people are being irresponsible about having children. They don't really care because the government will give them money, free baby formula, free child care, etc. And who pays for it? People who do exercise responsibility and hold down a steady job.

I'm not trying to say these people are all lazy welfare bums who can't stop having kids, I'm just making a general statement. I know there are people who work hard that life isn't as kind to as others. So please don't label me as cold and insensitive. The truth is if you go to college/get training, get married, and wait to have kids 'till you're financially responsible, you won't be all screwed up.

Answer 3

I don't have any problem with the government helping people who have kids they can't afford. I DO have a problem with people who keep having kids they can't afford so as to keep collecting money from the government. If you have a kid and need help paying for him/her while you go to college so that you can get a good job to support your children I am fine with that. Just don't waste my tax money because you are too lazy to work.

Answer 4

To H Wallbanga - you are so wrong. Why do avoid answering the question by your knee jerk reaction, 'blame it on the rich folk?' People think 'rich' people should pay more taxes. What do you think the rich people do with their money? They buy things and keep the economy going. They start businesses. They pay more in taxes already because they are rich. You keep wanting to tax them wallbanga and pretty soon there will be no incentive to be rich. And since we are on the subject, why do so many people who don't have money hate the rich and think taxing them will solve all of THEIR problems? Taxing the rich is what politicians say they will do to get the poor people to vote. Rich people don't get that way because YOU gave it to them - you buy their products, you work for their companies, etc. So before you go have more children, there should be a test to see if you are intelligent, and if you are fit to be a parent. Those on welfare are neither.

Answer 5

per chance your answer is abortion for those undesirable pregnancies? compelled abortion, even? i'm and adoptive figure. except you're, then you definately've in all probability finished no longer some thing to assist any of the toddlers who will be raised in poverty because it truly is, and in squalor once you've your way. As a instructor, I observed each day the consequences to toddlers of the truly stupid movements and alternatives of the mother and dad. you could't be professional-existence before the youngster passes by potential of the cervix and under no circumstances have some compassion for the toddlers AFTER the start procedure is done. even as I agree thoroughly that some human beings shouldn't reproduce, i'm no longer keen to punish the youngster for the stupidity of the mother and dad. regrettably, increasing the month-to-month charge to the figure to conceal the higher value of raising the added baby is the only way accessible to ascertain that the youngster is cared for with the equipment we've. further as an edit after reading many of the different solutions - actual, i became inquisitive about putting some my scholars on some kind of birth control that she couldn't ignore to soak up order to circumvent being pregnant. in spite of the indisputable fact that, as a libertarian, I knew that slippery slope became one i'd pick to stay off of. an similar with eliminating toddlers from the living house - sure, it is totally the cleanest answer, yet regrettably adoption, no longer to tutor foster care, has its personal set of issues. the base line is there is no "basic" remedy for systemic and cultural issues.

Answer 6

If the government didn't, you'd be asking why they won't give welfare to people who can't afford their kids. Wouldn't you.

Answer 7

Personally if people actually need help and are trying to work to a better situation then give them the help. It is the people who get on welfare just so they don't have to work that up set me. There should stricter standards to allow people on and regulate how long they can stay.

Answer 8

I suppose the government wants to take care of the people.

I think it's a good thing but it can be bad. Australian government increased the maternity payment a few years ago. Now theres so many girls having babies for the money. It's terrible.
Our prime minister is such a stupid dick head.

Answer 9

A better question would be why do rich people get tax breaks. I'd much rather help the poor than pay for corporations that mismanage their finances