Your country is playing in the World Cup --- then suddenly a player of the other side dives and the referee award a penalty which will send your country out of the world cup. -- Would you prefer your country to be kicked out of the WC as result of the dive or would you prefer a camera to playback the clip that will clear your country and punish the DIVER even though that may cause the game to stop for a couple of minutes while the CHEAT is shown to be a cheat, sent off and your country not suffer the injustice ? SO WHY DOES FIFA KEEP RESISTING the introduction of cameras because, they say, cameras would "BREAK the flow of the game "!?? LOLOLO and headbutting does not break the game ? and the dives do not stop the flow of the game by more than 2 minutes ? and malicous fouls don't either ? Or may the introduction of cameras would put a stop once and for all to BIASED referees ? THAT is the reason why. Your views are appreciated. (full analysis please, no one liners. Thank you
2006-07-11
03:31:59
·
12 answers
·
asked by
RED-CHROME
6
in
Sports
➔ Football
➔ Mexican Football (Soccer)
"Give Me a Br..." -- the question is
YOUR VIEWS PLEASE - that is the question. You ought to read questions until the end.
2006-07-11
03:37:22 ·
update #1