English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Your country is playing in the World Cup --- then suddenly a player of the other side dives and the referee award a penalty which will send your country out of the world cup. -- Would you prefer your country to be kicked out of the WC as result of the dive or would you prefer a camera to playback the clip that will clear your country and punish the DIVER even though that may cause the game to stop for a couple of minutes while the CHEAT is shown to be a cheat, sent off and your country not suffer the injustice ? SO WHY DOES FIFA KEEP RESISTING the introduction of cameras because, they say, cameras would "BREAK the flow of the game "!?? LOLOLO and headbutting does not break the game ? and the dives do not stop the flow of the game by more than 2 minutes ? and malicous fouls don't either ? Or may the introduction of cameras would put a stop once and for all to BIASED referees ? THAT is the reason why. Your views are appreciated. (full analysis please, no one liners. Thank you

2006-07-11 03:31:59 · 12 answers · asked by RED-CHROME 6 in Sports Football Mexican Football (Soccer)

"Give Me a Br..." -- the question is
YOUR VIEWS PLEASE - that is the question. You ought to read questions until the end.

2006-07-11 03:37:22 · update #1

12 answers

I think you are right. People do cheat and it is not always seen by the naked eye. I think it should be allowed if it was the big mess that just occured never would of gotten a far as it did. I feel bad because it was not fair to all of the loyal fans who got jipped because two guys can not talk nice to each other. It is just a game in the end and the only ones dissappointed are the fans the loyal countrymen who had to see two men acting like small children playing a game of tag. With the playback we all could have had nothing to worry or talk about because we could of seen who was being fair and who was cheating.

2006-07-11 03:37:33 · answer #1 · answered by mrsdamico22 3 · 1 1

I've said this before here. I think FIFA needs to replicate what the NHL does. All NHL games are reviewed on video. If a player takes a dive, regardless of the referee's reaction, the NHL mails a letter to the player warning them that their dive was caught and not do it again. The second time the player is fined and is suspended for a game. The consequences then escalate with each infraction.

While I think video replay should be used in goal determination during the game, I would not agree with your suggestion.

2006-07-11 03:44:54 · answer #2 · answered by achatter77 2 · 0 0

Definetely better if they replay it. Referees are usually into favoring the big teams, like what happened between Italy and Australia. FIFA just doesn't want to get on the case of unfair referees, they're probably bribed by those "big" countries. Oh, the only reason Zidane was sent-off was because it was a super obvious aggresion, and a very stupid one at that. But I think something else FIFA should do is get at the player that provokes those aggresions.

2006-07-11 10:37:42 · answer #3 · answered by wiseguy 2 · 0 0

UEFA doesn't allow camera's to replay any part or clip of the game. It is only allowed to show the score and time and has had success along with its full-time referees and fifa should follow suit.

2006-07-11 07:39:01 · answer #4 · answered by wvu_fool_22 2 · 0 0

Why you and almost everybody call a diver a cheater? Everybody does it, but when the diver is from your team, you applaud him. And referees aren't biased, they make mistakes. The level of incompetence are worst than ever. The skills of the players are also at the worst level ever. Name just one great team or a great player.

2006-07-11 03:40:31 · answer #5 · answered by elgil 7 · 0 0

i think cameras would be good, but they should also get rid of all the little kiddie fouls like offsides and why is it a foul on you when the other guy trips himself then cries about it like a little italian baby?

2006-07-11 03:35:52 · answer #6 · answered by Eric D 3 · 0 0

What's the question?

2006-07-11 03:33:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes

2006-07-11 04:34:36 · answer #8 · answered by da frownup 2 · 0 0

it would be disrespecting a referes dessisson

2006-07-11 15:18:35 · answer #9 · answered by Tapatio 2 · 0 0

huh

2006-07-11 03:34:23 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers