2006-07-11 03:18:29 · 15 answers · asked by jh_smith_jr 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
yes it was.
Superman Returns is an awesome movie.
I can honestly say it was one of the best movies I've ever seen.
I thought it was going to be cliche and over done but i stand corrected. I loved the movie.
2006-07-11 03:55:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
Yes, although X3 was a good movie, too. Superman Returns is the best movie I've seen all year.
2006-07-11 14:45:20 · answer #2 · answered by Vanessa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
x-men 3 had a lot more action and comedy, i liked it better. superman returns was really serious and slow. i liked both of the movies.
2006-07-11 10:22:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it was, but that's only because I think Brett Ratner killed the X-men franchise. The third film was way weaker than either of the first two, and there was zero character development.
I'd put the first 2 X-men films ahead of Superman, but not the third.
2006-07-11 10:22:05 · answer #4 · answered by Craig S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've not watched superman returns..but from what i heard it's not good!! so i'll say x-men 3 would be better!!besides..i pefer x-men to superman!!
2006-07-11 10:23:14 · answer #5 · answered by braich_gal 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No X-Men was way better I... Superman was a great movie though.
2006-07-11 15:27:46 · answer #6 · answered by Luna 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES! X-Men had action and no plot and Brett Ratner screwed it up badly. Superman Returns actually had some heart.
2006-07-11 11:39:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO SUPERMAN RETURNS WAS A WASTE OF MY MONEY. THERE WHERE SOME GREAT SCENES BUT IT WAS KIND OF BORING. JUST TO FIND OUT SOMETHING ABOUT LOIS AND SUPERMAN..... I DONT WANT TO SPOIL IT FOR THE OTHERS.
2006-07-11 11:38:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
even if lois lane paraded around in only her red underwear thru the whole movie, it wont be better than x-men 3. no offense kate bosworth.
2006-07-11 10:22:19 · answer #9 · answered by jaz o 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'll put it up for grabs, my wuestion is if superman was 3 hrs longs, why wasn't just as long?
2006-07-11 10:23:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋