English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Can anyone tell me?? If possible, I hope 2 see da working to get the answer.

2006-07-11 02:12:26 · 12 answers · asked by arsenal_chun17 3 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

12 answers

It's the organizational concept of synergy, where the sum of the parts is greater than produces more than the typical total. This concept is usually used to describe how teamwork will lead to better production in a firm.

2006-07-11 02:17:26 · answer #1 · answered by Will the Thrill 5 · 0 2

Hi:

The only way this could happen is if your counting in the binary system or base 2 here why:


16,8,4,2,1 are the place placeholder in the binary system

00001 = 1 decimal because 1 is in the one place
00010 = 2 decimal because 1 is in the two's place
00011 = 3 decimal because 1 in the two's places and 1 in the ones place and 2+1 = 3 decimal or 11 binary equals three


01001 = 9 decimal. you do the math.


hope this answer your question

2006-07-14 20:45:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A man (1) + a woman (1) = a father, a mother and a child (3)

I win?

2006-07-11 09:16:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

frnd_pandey: That's funny and I didn't catch the error first time around. But I got it second time. lol...

BTW, no 1+1 never = 3. This is mathematics. There are certain truths that can not be broken and still be considered sane. The principles of addition are one of those.

2006-07-11 09:58:14 · answer #4 · answered by David J 2 · 0 0

If you are reporting numbers to the nearest whole digit, but you are adding:

1.4 + 1.4 = 2.8

this could be rewritten as

1 + 1 = 3

However, this is really cheating. You can get it to work in Excel by displaying only the whole digit, but in experiments and such if you are reporting only to the nearest whole number, you are saying that any information down there is just garbage and it should be removed.

2006-07-11 10:15:11 · answer #5 · answered by Steve W 3 · 0 0

i dont know but here's a proof 2=0

1=1
sqrt(1)=sqrt(1) --- 1=1, -1 = -1, -1=1, 1=-1

1+-1=1+1
0=2

hehe

2006-07-11 09:32:43 · answer #6 · answered by Croasis 3 · 0 0

Because two people's strength should be tripled if put together, not just doubled. Otherwise, I think Peppermint is right.

2006-07-11 09:35:45 · answer #7 · answered by Eric X 5 · 0 0

SEX. .....also, 1+1=4(twins); 1=1=5(triplets) ETC.

2006-07-11 09:27:08 · answer #8 · answered by jfmm 7 · 0 0

It isn't dumbass. Dat's just fo stupid nerdy smartass school kids who wun act stupid.

2006-07-11 09:23:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

let;s take
a=b=1
now take
a=b
square both the sides
a2=b2
now substract b2 frm both sides..
a2-b2=0..................................................(1)
and also a-b=0.........................................(2)
frm eqn 1 &2
a2-b2=a-b
(a-b)(a+b)=a-b
cancel out (a-b) frm both side
so
a+b=0
add 1 to each side
a+b+1=1
put a=b=1.........
so 3=1....cracked...bt its wrong guess .....? i know the fault....

2006-07-11 09:33:15 · answer #10 · answered by frnd_pandey 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers