2006-07-11 02:10:46 · 29 answers · asked by heartless 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Other - Family & Relationships
Everyone is entitled to their opinion in the USA but maybe before you assume someone is a QUACK you need to understand who they are and what they do. Dr.Phil has a B.A., M.A. and a Ph.D and is a licensed Clinical Psychologist ( that is human behavior and understanding why people do what they do and the effects on society and themselves). Just because you do not agree with his mannerism or opinion does not mean he is a Quack which is defined in the Websters dictionary as a fake doctor, false pretender to medical skills. I suggest you take a page from Dr. Phil and get a education and understand the meaning of words and research a topic before assuming anything.
2006-07-11 02:33:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
I think Dr. Phil is not a quack. He encourages and gives positive direction to those who need. His advice is not always going to be correct or the best, but still gets the people going in the right direction. He advises as a leader does.
2006-07-11 02:16:00 · answer #2 · answered by baratonefill77 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hes not even a damn doctor. All he does is tell the truth to people in an honest forward way. So hes basically not even a quack.
2006-07-11 02:13:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do, but his guests are much more quacked than he is. I never miss his show. I love watching insane americans make fools of themselves on TV. What a weird country......
2006-07-11 02:14:00 · answer #4 · answered by pieter U3 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dr. Phil is one of the worst people on earth. He has no morals of his own. He only says what he thinks is most popular at the time in order to get ratings. If child molesting was more widely excepted, he would advocate for child molesting, if the KKK was more popular, he would side with the KKK.
2016-10-20 14:45:16 · answer #5 · answered by Georgio 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he even qualifies as a quack. More like a nutcase if you ask me.
2006-07-11 02:12:58 · answer #6 · answered by fun_guy_otown 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's not a quack about everything.............just the things I have different opinions then him about!
2006-07-11 02:34:02 · answer #7 · answered by Sue 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think that he is a quack.
2006-07-11 02:12:48 · answer #8 · answered by boeckers2 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do. He is not really a doctor and no professionally weighing such as a PhD. He is only be popular because of Oprah.
2006-07-11 02:13:42 · answer #9 · answered by gentlgodis 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
he has a lot of resources and he may think that he knows it all but there is no person on earth that knows everything there is to know so I guess in a way he is but there is in a way that he's not like people that believe in him and what he does.
2006-07-11 02:17:30 · answer #10 · answered by mossey2003 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋