especially in India where millions of people are starving,
is it so diffcult their job compared to labours??
2006-07-10 23:54:18 · 13 answers · asked by jamuna160180 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Cricketers film stars in India earn too much. Even the starving poor ape them.
2006-07-11 00:00:29 · answer #1 · answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you disagree with an actor's salary, don't go to movies or watch T.V. Alex Rodriguez got a $250 MILLION dollar contract from the Texas Rangers. He's not an actor, but an entertainer none the less. As long as people are willing to pay the price of the ticket, the person who makes the draw should get as much money as he/she can. If you are referring to India in particular, the same rules apply. Many actors/musicians, etc. give money to various charities and causes. Capitalism rules of supply and demand rule the salaries of people of all professions in many countries. That's just the way it is.
2006-07-11 00:13:09 · answer #2 · answered by Spillski 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I dont think actors or celebrities should be paid so much. If you ask me, stage artistes do a better job than film stars without retakes.
As for labours, my heart really goes out to them. I am an expat in a country where I see hundreds of Indian labourers working in terrible conditions and not to mention the heat. So many of them die here due to heat stroke, but none of the local news papers print those news.
I dream of the day when the rich would feel for the poor and share some of their wealth...if not by charity, atleast by providing free education which could atleast bring them in the middle class slot.
2006-07-11 00:53:50 · answer #3 · answered by CURIOUS 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I think that each movie should have different actors, every time . The price of movies would drop, more people would go to the theater, and more people would get a chance to be an actor in a movie. The only time they should get to star in another movie , is for a sequel.
2006-07-11 00:06:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's tricky and I don't disagree with you, but it comes down to their ability to make money for a studio.
There is only one Brad Pitt, and any movie he stars in is guaranteed to make money... so he negotiates a large salary, and its paid to him, knowing that he is a moneymaker. He can command that kind of salary. The problem is, labourers cannot make their companies millions of dollars in one shot, and even if they could, they are easily replaced. Nobody will miss a ditch digger, but millions would miss Mr. Pitt. Is it fair? Hardly. Is it life? Absolutely.
2006-07-11 00:00:49 · answer #5 · answered by porterismmovement 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No i imagine that when it is composed of kin and extraordinarily to youthful toddlers, their privateness should be respected! I propose those youthful toddlers ask for no longer some thing! I do believe you in spite of the indisputable fact that on the undeniable reality that when a celeb has chosen to bare and unveil their privateness for the sake of their occupation, they shoudn't be a great deal surprised to change into the media prey! it truly is for positive! So i guess it truly is a decision in spite of the indisputable fact that the media ought to comprehend those who do not pick to be uncovered!
2016-12-01 01:24:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they go a good job, then yes, they deserve the money, because it just like any other job in the world.
2006-07-10 23:57:14 · answer #7 · answered by ODUSylence08 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
blame it on those who are glued to the tube! and also to the tv networks who are fighting for every penny they have...as long as there are tv/movie addicts tuned in to the newest soap operas/movies then those stupid actors will get so much...more than what they really deserve
2006-07-11 00:01:15 · answer #8 · answered by justine b 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not really
but then again, if they make a good movie, and lots of people pay to see it, that is why actors/etc. make so much, so if they are that good, i guess so
2006-07-11 00:00:39 · answer #9 · answered by crystal & benjamin 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think having granted that they're life now is a public property it is worth it... yeah! i think doctors who save people lives to a carpenter building our homes should receive more... but this is life...
2006-07-11 00:27:18 · answer #10 · answered by unpretty 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋