I know that the American people were not asked to vote on this one world government. This president and all of his rich "base" buddies are taking this country down from the inside right under our noses. We are more or less owned by China. New World Order. This agenda for the New World Order is on the fast track. America needs to wake up. We will become slaves under this agenda, live in a police state, have no rights, lose our homes under emminent domain laws, and have to carry a national ID card now proposed to "identify ourselves as American citizens" to stop illegal immigration. If this sounds faintly familiar,read up on how these same tactics were used in Germany. It is quite frightening. My mother-in-law is from Belgium and lived through it. They thought Hitler was a great leader at first....and then...And I thought we left England and the monarchy behind. King George?
2006-07-10 22:35:24 · 8 answers · asked by sammy 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
What in the world are you talking about? Stop drinking the Kool-Aid man, it has really started to affect your brain.
Do you think Clinton protected us from the one world government concept?
The world is getting smaller, a one world government is the logical conclusion (though I suspect we will not see it for centuries). It is simply a matter of approach. The left tends to believe that we should be subjected to a one world government (i.e. if the international community and/or UN says to do something we must follow along). The right tends to believe that we should lead a one world government.
Given that a New World Order (note I don't by into the crazies theories on this, but simply acknowledge the trend over 1000's of years.) is going to happen, I would rather lead it then follow it.
2006-07-10 22:44:02 · answer #1 · answered by tm_tech32 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly, it relies upon on what you propose by technique of "dumb." Do you propose low intelligence? Poorly knowledgeable? Or do you propose undesirable judgement and determination-making? because those should be very distinct issues. And presidents, being all too human, are sure to make some undesirable judgements and say dumb issues. in spite of the indisputable fact that liberals have placed distinctive time and ability into the myth that W Bush became dumb, he wasn't. He became a awful public speaker, to be positive, yet it truly isn't any longer how intelligence is measured.
2016-12-01 01:21:25 · answer #2 · answered by braye 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dude, you tin foil hat seems to have a hole in it.
The main difference between Bush and Hitler is that Hitler bullied his way into power. Bush was elected-twice. Hitler, once installed, wasn't going anywhere. Bush only has two more years. After that, he is out.
You can't impeach him, he has committed no impeachable offenses. Can he be recalled, I don't know and I don't care, and it's a moot point. But the media and moveon.org are going to keep chewing that bone in the hope that enough eejits will bite.
2006-07-11 01:01:05 · answer #3 · answered by kelly24592 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So what your saying is Bush is working for China... in which China already is the NWO that which controls everything on this planet.
Why are you blaming Bush then if it is China controlling everything?
Yeah yeah yeah Bush this Bush that... Bush is to blame for that huge terd I left in the toilet yesterday also
And these Nazi like controlling laws which are passed... their drafted by your lefty buddies (for the most part)
2006-07-10 22:46:02 · answer #4 · answered by ne0teric 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man what a great concept. We the people sign petitions that say
'We do not want you for our President'. Let's all concentrate on finding someone to coordiante this effort.
2006-07-11 02:59:19 · answer #5 · answered by Lou 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just more incohearant ramblings by a looney-lefty.
2006-07-10 22:40:41 · answer #6 · answered by Jolly1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simple answer NO.
2006-07-19 10:47:50 · answer #7 · answered by captianpr 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
2006-07-10 22:51:56 · answer #8 · answered by andrew f 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋