English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I came across an experiement of a condom,milk and warm water.
You get a condom,put the milk in it and you get a basen put the warm water in it and take the condom with milk in it and put it in warm water and wait for about five(5) minutes,then after that the warm water turn milky because of osmosis.
I believe that the condom is not 100% protective and in this experiement the warm water act as the virgina and the milk in the condom as the serm,the moving of milk from a condom to warm water simply mean the condom allow fluid to get in and out.If you test this you will see for your self and prove that what i am saying is real.

2006-07-10 22:31:32 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Other - Social Science

8 answers

In studies of large groups, 15% of women using condoms for birth control will become pregnant in the first year. (1)

"The normal human sperm head has a width range of 2.5 to 3.5 microns (micrometers) and a length range of 5 to 7 microns." (2)

Viruses are much smaller than sperm. (I would have to search for hours to get past the anti-sex groups to find the actual size of HIV, but viruses are *really little*!) I *believe* it's around 0.1 micron, but I can't document that.

Virginia, milk, men, women, it doesn't matter. Condoms are the most effective method of protection against HIV during sex with an infected partner.

They are not infallible. The only way to be 100% safe (sexually safe, that is; there are other ways to contract HIV) is to abstain from sex with anyone who could be infected. And that could be anyone. Barring abstinence, barrier methods of protection, like condoms, are your safest choice outside of a monogamous relationship with a partner known to be virus-free.

Is there still someone who can read and write who doesn't know that?!?

2006-07-11 14:19:08 · answer #1 · answered by LazlaHollyfeld 6 · 1 0

It is a well known fact that condoms are not 100% effective; it says that on the box. Wearing a condom will significantly reduce your chances of contracting HIV, but will not guarantee it 100%.
Also, semen does not have the same proportion of water as milk does, the process of osmosis you are describing would not occur. That being said, a man can fill an entire condom with semen, the way you are describing one filled with milk, there is something wrong with him.
Cheers!

2006-07-10 22:39:29 · answer #2 · answered by Claire F 2 · 0 0

sorry but your experiment only proves that there are molecules in milk that will move across a membrane after 5 minutes...it has nothing to do with larger viruses. And vaginal fluid is a little more complicated than warm water.

2006-07-10 22:39:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yeah.. I condom is not 100 % protective.. not only condom but any other contraceptive measures..

But you have to check the condom before..

nope.. I dont think thats right..

Even though its not 100 % protective.. still its the Best in preventing HIV/AIDS/STD and pregnancy!!!

2006-07-10 22:45:41 · answer #4 · answered by Jin 4 · 0 0

You are right. Condoms are not 100% safe but by far is the safest tool for protection against HIV.

2006-07-10 22:35:36 · answer #5 · answered by Kasual Kyle 1 · 0 0

wait wait. so let me get this straight....you came up with something that involves a condom, milk, and water?

wtf.

2006-07-10 22:35:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

wouldn't the very fact that someone had HIV/AIDS put you off having sex with them?

2006-07-10 23:11:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it CANNOT prevent anything.
ask details here http://beadchaim.org.il/english.html

2006-07-10 22:35:31 · answer #8 · answered by Radio Girl 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers