2006-07-10 21:12:43 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance ➔ Corporations
Unilimited. Besides, a maze of cross holding patterns makes it difficult to define a subsidiary. For example, the cross holding pattern in Automotive sector leaves only 4-5 major players in reality.
2006-07-10 21:21:38 · answer #1 · answered by mkaamsel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The law does not set a limit, a sensible structure for the company is what will drive the number of subsidiaries/associated companies.
2006-07-11 07:55:20 · answer #2 · answered by Veritas 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've worked on a company with over 300 subsidiaries of various forms. There's no real limit in terms of number, it's more the function of purpose and feasibility.
2006-07-10 21:15:53 · answer #3 · answered by Nikki W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No limit as far as Im aware, but one company is not allowed to have the monopoly on an item / service
2006-07-10 21:22:25 · answer #4 · answered by Secret Squirrel 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes all correct, I've worked under one main company along with a few thousand other individuals who were all their own companies, it was a good choice!
2006-07-10 21:19:48 · answer #5 · answered by budding author 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As many as will fit, everyone else will either have to suffer the rain or bring their own.
2006-07-10 21:22:16 · answer #6 · answered by HiFi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's no limit...
2006-07-10 21:16:24 · answer #7 · answered by akampro 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no limit
2006-07-10 21:17:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋