Nuclear fission is very expensive and a danger to humanity, fortunately uranium will soon disappear. Why not to invest in other ways more friendly to environment and health? Only because of fast money?
2006-07-10 20:11:39 · 5 answers · asked by immaculated 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
What do the English have to do with that question? Lay off the beer, pal.
2006-07-10 20:15:37 · answer #1 · answered by synchronicity915 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
OI! Tony Blair is a d ickhead, Most of the English public dont agree with a thing he says. The thing about Tony Blair is that he thinks the biggest success of his time in office is the bill of human rights he passed, funnily enough Cherie Blair (his wife) is a human rights lawyer so for him it would be the biggest success because hes keeping his wifes purse bulging. The bloke is a bell-end and I resent being associated with him.......
2006-07-11 03:38:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where is uranium going to disappear to? Is this a trick question? Or are you just in over your head?
2006-07-11 03:18:38 · answer #3 · answered by letem haveit 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nuclear is enviromentely freindly - people just give it **** for what happens in the case of a disater etc etc
2006-07-11 03:15:42 · answer #4 · answered by Adam (AM) 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blair and his chums are liekly to be advisors to US firms - good work if you can get it!
2006-07-11 03:32:38 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋