Democrat solutions for all problems.
1. Raise taxes on the rich.
2. Create another government beaurocy
3. Blame Bush.
2006-07-10 19:36:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'd quite have Cindy Sheehan in Congress, instead of the Looney Bat Pelosi, Cindy a minimum of has some principals..... And Code pink...... properly they're as functional as those females on the View!
2016-12-01 01:14:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by rudnick 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
GLOBAL WARMING/THE ENVIRONMENT IN GENERAL
Any and I mean any environmental cause or approach must be grassroots in nature. Having PhD's talk about global warming and having those representing industry interests debunk these present theories is a high level and almost an entirely futile effort. Don't get me wrong, it is great that someone with Al Gore's connections and exposure is getting the word out. However, people are people they want to see results.
Yes, the expression is now trite but still true, "Thing Globally, Act Locally". Watching the sky over a city, town or even a more rural area become darkened by smog has local impact, people take note and actually see A PROBLEM. A problem that can measured in terms of air quality or perhaps an AIR QUALITY HEALTH INDEX like the one that the provincial government in Ontario, Canada is in the process of implementing. You can measure results (however small) in terms of air quality and the affect it has on the health care system (those with breathing problems, doctor's visits, etc). It certainly speaks to the advantage of a UNIVERSAL health care system (however, actually implemented) as it actually makes sense to improve the environment as it keeps people healthy (a humanitarian cause) and when health care it publicly funded it affects the public coffers when people become ill therefore it even makes better financial sense to keep the environment a top priority.
Plus any approach must be entire with a complete overall plan (the big picture). Including recycling initiatives, energy solutions (alternatives/renewables can now present a real potential financial threat to the big oil companies and even power companies...), government involvement at all levels, public transit, greener vehicles in general (Hybrid, Hydrogen, Conventional electric, bio-diesel, ethanol), conservation in all energy arenas, ETC!
Economic viability is the real sell as many of these solutions are just that economically sensible (ensuring we look at the entire picture). Yes as more people use solar, wind and other renewable energy sources the cheaper the technology will get. Two of the newest billionaires have earned a large portion through renewables Solar (India I believe) and Wind (China I believe). Yes in many ways developing nations and economies will be the first and early adopters of such renewable tech as they are just building much of their infrastructure.
So what do we all need to do? GET INVOLVED ! Contact your local government about improving your recycling program, contact provincial/state/federal government about the adopting of these new technologies (renewables such as solar/wind), buy gas with ethanol in it and demand it, use and demand bio diesel, buy products with less packaging and demand manufacturers to reduce packaging and to offer a price break as a result. More ECONOMIC VIABILITY! After all energy diversity just like economic diversity is the safest and best bet for good long term results and return on investment.
Joe...
KEEP IT UP MR. GORE THE POLAR BEARS NEED YOU FIRST **GRIN**.
2006-07-12 11:51:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both Cindy Sheehan and Al Gore are idiots.
2006-07-17 16:09:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by lord_windishmere 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they both do. Sheehan should have kept her son from joining the service if she or he did not know the risks of serving. It turns my stomach to see this waste of a person receiving attention gained from her sons death. She new he was joining the Marine Corp not a country club on some beach. She needs to get over herself, respect his death and service to his country and get on with her life.......that is if she has one. I'll give Gore the bore a break tonight. I've vented enough already. lol. Good question.
2006-07-10 19:56:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by bankster 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Would you really like to learn how to name-call, you criminally stupid, rectal brained, sh*t-spewing, a**-faced Bush whore??! I'm so glad that there are idiots like you in this world! You make it so easy to laugh at, because your I.Q.'s are in the low double-digits, you have no senses of humor and no consciences, and you invariably drool sh*t from having your heads so far up your rectal canals!! ANYONE, ANYONE who would try to destroy a courageous woman, Cindy Sheehan, who lost her son in an illegal conflict perpetrated by a criminal hick, is morally and emotionally bankrupt!! Republicans and Neo-Cons will NEVER have the respect of the civilized world, EVER AGAIN!! And in November, I will rejoice when the movement to get them completely our of our lives begins!! People of conscience, have faith, our day is rapidly arriving!!
2006-07-10 19:54:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rebooted 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I watched the Inconvenient Truth and it seemed very real. I do believe in global warming and we should all stop driving suvs and start biking!
2006-07-10 20:23:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with everything you said except one thing.... How dare you compare Cindy to a cow. Cows are beautiful and useful creatures.
2006-07-10 19:59:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
She is exploiting the death of her son. Shame on her. She has no credibility and is a complete moron. The only credibility she has is the mother of a dead soldier. She doesn't know sh it about politics. She is way out of her league.
2006-07-10 19:43:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by de rak 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
OK, berry berry two shoes. You sure are clever.
2006-07-10 19:39:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by zclifton2 6
·
0⤊
0⤋