If a party was Socially Liberal, but Financially Conservative, would you vote for them instead of Rep/Dem?

Question

the party I am speaking of is the Libertarian Party

Answer 1

Yes, I would and I do.

Of course, as most libertarians know, the most viable option for libertarians that want freedom in their lifetime is the Free State Project.

Answer 2

Definitely. I agree with much of the platform of the Libertarian Party but see no chance whatsoever of them ever amounting to anything. To accept their ideas means taking the time to think and that is something most people have little interest in doing.

Answer 3

once you're fiscally conservative and socially liberal then you're a libertarian, solid success electing one in all those. The Democratic party is liberal sufficient to make issues paintings. What I propose is once you follow immediately liberal plans you've a ideal plan. The guidelines like HCR will pay themselves off in the subsequent ten years and delivers the country a surplus. you is likewise in simple terms no longer dropping money on warfare. economic conservatism like giving tax breaks to the wealthy is what supplies us a deficit. that's a terrible equipment. the challenge with trickle down economics is the wealthy receives a flood and something else human beings receives no longer something yet a trickle. -bill

Answer 4

No, you can't just meet in the middle and decide the issues with a soccer game. You actually have to come up with a new language, concepts and ideas that explains how the two sides can work together. And then you have to sell it to everybody. It is like creating a new language and then selling it at the market. Except that you are not selling for profit in dollars, you are convincing, enticing, persuading, connecting with a bunch of folks who talk different languages and judge things with different perspectives, perceptions and belief systems.

Answer 5

Because of 40 years of liberalism. America went down hill in the 60's when birth control and drugs were introduced to society. Liberalism was born, the USA has gone down hill every since.

In with liberalism, out with shame.
Now days its ok for a woman to have a kid with no dad. These bastard kids grow up with the only male role model they know of (the punk gang banger in baggy pants rapping on MTV).

Want to know how to fix the problem?

Bring back public hangings.
Get rid of public education, and put kids into private schools.
Move all prisons overseas to China and hose all the turds of society there.

Answer 6

Don't know, depends on the candidate. I am a Liberal, but if a Democrat doesn't fit my description of an ideal candidate and a republican does, I will vote republican. But since I am just 19 and has never had the chance to vote, what do I know?

Answer 7

You can not be socially liberal and financially conservative. Also there are many pro-life libertarians.

Answer 8

No. I vote based on the particular candidates' politics, not their party. Usually, I end up voting Republican, but there have been rare occasions where I have voted Democrat.

Answer 9

Hmmmm....I seem to recall Clinton being socially liberal, and yet passing free trade deals and balancing the budget. Sounds to me like you are talking about the Democrats.

Aahhhh....the good old days. Who could have known 5 years ago how prophetic this spoof would prove to be.....

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28784?issue=4228&special=2001

Answer 10

Yes. The difficulty is that Libertarians do not seem to have enough controls in place.