I do
2006-07-10 18:48:24 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
Now that i ahve been married 3 years, i totally agree with them, as long as they are within reason. we dont have money, but stipulations regarding other things are a plus, such as sex and child rearing.
2006-07-10 18:53:30 · answer #1 · answered by Bonnie G 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depending on how strong your love is---if you don't trust each other, pre-nups are the way to go if you insist on being married, but if you trust each other as much as you love each other, it's demeaning to both people.
2006-07-11 01:53:35 · answer #2 · answered by save_up_your_tears 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont like the idea of them but i agree with it. If 1 person or both want to protect their assets before the marriage then they should. However i would never sign one :)
2006-07-11 02:34:43 · answer #3 · answered by Educated 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i DO TOO. NOW IF I WERE GETTING MARRIED AND HAD ALOT OF PROPERTY, MONEY AND ETC I WOULD HAVE A PRE-NUP AS I WOULD FEEL THAT ALL MY POSSESSIONS WERE MINE BEFORE I MET MR RIGHT AND VISA VERSA TOWARDS THE MAN...IF HE HAD MONEY BEFORE HE MET ME................
2006-07-11 01:53:38 · answer #4 · answered by Carol H 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if the prenups before marraige and not after
2006-07-11 02:43:34 · answer #5 · answered by insertstrawhere 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that they are important in today's world and if there is a large difference in assets
2006-07-11 01:56:08 · answer #6 · answered by showtimegk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Me too. There's nothing like leaving them on the street the same way you found them when they divorce you.
2006-07-11 01:53:31 · answer #7 · answered by lelekid4ever 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It all depends which side of the coin you are in.
2006-07-11 01:51:45 · answer #8 · answered by Tuxi X 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do
2006-07-11 01:52:48 · answer #9 · answered by Pete 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋