Avoiding another world war???

Question

Action obviously has to be taken against troublesome countries such as North Korea, Iran, along with other terrist/communist/other...bad stuff....countries lol. what do you think we should do about these upcoming international crisees (sp). If we should go to war, whom should we attack first and by what means? (nuclear, invasion ect...)

jhon d, you are an ignorant asshole who needs to learn that it is America whom hold the world together. Who else can keep peace? obviously not the liberal tampons over on the left side b/c all they do is talk, never act.

Mr. samsa, you are the same as the rest of the sissy liberals. How can you say that we bother countries that mind their own business, when it was the leaders of Iraq and Afghanistan that played major roles in multiple terroristic attacks on both america and other countries. We still have a few more to beat, but i'm all for the idea of killing the enemy before they kill you. But in your case...you deserve to die.

Answer 1

I do not think there will be another world war because most countries are too withdrawn from reality. Examples can be found in France and Great Britain who were once world powers but now are just members of the has been gang. China does not want to damage the trade they are doing and Russia has enough problems beating off the rebels and gangsters. Putin may get the socialist style back in action but with the loss of the Ukraine and other central European states Russia is also a has been. I think we should take out the north Korean missile sites and also the Iranian nuclear facilities. Naturally the rest of the world will ***** about it but they are useless anyhow. Knock out the competition before it gets to you. Our biggest problem will be the left wing wacko's who want to have peace and prosperity.

Answer 2

Your question contradicts itself, by first asking how to avoid the next world war, and then asking whom we should attack first. If and when the next world war starts within the foreseeable future, it will most likely be so because the United States initiated the military conflict. This is evident because of our nation's recent history of waging preemptory warfare on other countries which are otherwise minding their own business, as well as this Administration's continual threats against other countries it has labeled as "rogue nations".

We are a nation of bullies. Bullies don't have the bad luck of always ending up in fights, despite what they may believe. Rather, they most often provoke them.

Answer 3

Niether Iran nor North Korea is threat to world peace. The real culprit is USA who is always creating problems in the world and want to control every county.......

World peace is not maintained by putting war on other countries nor by trying to turn the countries in the way which will benifit only USA.What USA is doing is selfishness to gain as much as possible from other countries

Answer 4

okay, no matter what happens, people are going to die. north korea will eventually get some sort of missles, and they are going to be the target of the free world. we're going to have to pull together, because we cannot pull another pre-emptive strike and expect the world to rally behind us. we're going to have to let north korea strike first and just hope to god we can survive it. or south korea, or japan or russia or whoever they attack....but we will have to take down north korea's regime and install some sort of democracy there and with more planning for it that in iraq.