All they did was allow you to dual wield the crap weapons and make more annoying missions, and everyone acts like it's the best ever. I know the multiplayer is great and all, but when it comes down to it, I really don't think they improved that very much either. The maps are all pointless and tired, or canned from Halo, so other than the fact that everybody owns this game, why do people think this is the greatest game ever when it seems like a gimmicky revamp of the old version?
2006-07-10 17:16:33 · 4 answers · asked by mbezlr 3 in Games & Recreation ➔ Video & Online Games
I did prefer the original Halo. It had better missions, and except for the SMG(in my opinion) the weapons were better, and the unforgettable story. I didn't think Halo 2 was crap, but it didn't have the same spark that the other had. However if they were to combine the two, it would make the people of the Playstation 2 fall to their knees and beg for the mercy of Microsoft. Lets just hope that Halo 3 is better, or it will be another series that gradually got worse.
2006-07-10 18:09:52 · answer #1 · answered by Dr. Stupid 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We Halo fans find it our way of finalizing whatever warrior pride we can drag out. Sure, there are other games out there with better combat, but Halo fans like me remain loyal to Halo and Halo 2, recognizing it as the only series in its league. There's a spark to it that never seems to die, and as long as we can remain competitive, we love it.
2006-07-11 02:42:04 · answer #2 · answered by Caleb P 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the graphics are better. the missions are more fun. and there are a lot more multiplayer maps.
2006-07-11 00:20:26 · answer #3 · answered by Einstein 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i know it gets boring sometime try the xbox 360 games there awesome
2006-07-11 00:22:13 · answer #4 · answered by darkshadow3232 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋