English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think south america has better teams, Look at Argentina&Brazil which is the only good ones, But they can still take on European teams if they focus. So who do you think can play soccer better? South america? or European?

2006-07-10 17:06:32 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football FIFA World Cup (TM)

10 answers

Im going to say south america has a slightly better soccer, cause of Argentina and Brazil, But Europe has some good teams like France also

2006-07-10 17:07:54 · answer #1 · answered by ***The One*** 2 · 2 2

Difficult question! They sometimes do do a Europe Vs Rest of the World game and the Rest of the World team, if I am not mistaken, usually wins it, so that should answer the point. I just think they have better gelled players and the football played in South America is very similar and the overall quality better in terms of number of players. So, judging by those Europe-ROW games I go for Europe losing.

2016-03-27 00:32:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Europe has the better teams. South America has Brasil & Argentina, they would've had Colombia but their country is stable enough to have a national team. Europe has Italia, France, Germany, Great Britain, Portugal, Spain, and a couple of more teams. Maybe because the continent has more countries but I would still say that they are very dominant.

2006-07-10 17:41:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I don't know,but I can tell you a lot of European countries like France or Egland are way better than many countries in South america. france is my best team.

2006-07-10 17:13:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

South America. more specific Brasil. They play fair and by the rules, unlike France, Italy, Portugal. And I'm not saying that because I'm from Brasil. But they are a good team !!

2006-07-10 17:22:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

you know with all these amazing players in all different countries, anybody could beat anybody. it all depends on the chemistry of the team and what kind of day they have. example - ghana, they were doing everything right and outplayed brazil, but that ball would not go into that goal! it all depends...

2006-07-10 17:17:44 · answer #6 · answered by standstill 22 5 · 0 0

That's because soccer should only be played by 3rd world countries.

2006-07-10 17:10:09 · answer #7 · answered by merdenoms 4 · 0 0

European football is much more effective. Finally it counts that who becomes the champion.

2006-07-10 17:35:56 · answer #8 · answered by asok c 5 · 1 0

I think it really depends on the year. It seems that each year there are budding new talents popping out all over the world.

2006-07-10 17:09:56 · answer #9 · answered by Sonie 5 · 0 0

Think hard enough and you should be able to answer your own question.
3 of the 4 finalists were from Europe.

There's your answer

2006-07-10 17:11:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers