What would be one of the headlines in the papers?
2006-07-10 16:09:49 · 9 answers · asked by I am Sunshine 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
"GaNsTrZ..etc." I didn't know he was president of nush!?!?
2006-07-10 16:29:13 · update #1
"Republican's unite"
On a call for the impeachment of president Kerry..
Upset over new alligations involving "treasonous acts" in Vietnam..
2006-07-10 16:25:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Headline: Like Father Like Son, Both Bushes SingleTermers. Kerry Narrowly Defeats Bush
2006-07-10 16:39:28 · answer #2 · answered by Ryan W 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would've been president of Nush didn't cheat. I just got a Rolling Stone isuure and it told me everything about the election and how Kerry wouldv'e beeen preident.
2006-07-10 16:13:31 · answer #3 · answered by gangstrzOOkeeper 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please study the whole answer, when I get off my cleansing soap field, I do answer your question. I understand this could be a “what if question” yet 9/11 could in all probability by no skill have happened under a Democratic President. the reason a 9/11 by no skill happened in the time of former President Clinton’s term or in all probability by no skill could have happened in any respect under Democratic management is using the fact after the 1st attack on the international commerce center, Clinton observed how susceptible u . s . replaced into. He made specific no longer something could take place lower back on American soil and any Democratic predecessors could have saved the secure guards against such an attack in place. President Bush omitted warnings and enable our shield down. u . s . didn’t have yellow, orange or green days; extensive-unfold replaced right into a purple day for our defense force, our intelligence businesses, and this u . s .. What shade is at present? yet whilst 9/11 had happened under an imaginary President Kerry, he could have achieved precisely what President Bush stated he replaced into going to do yet didn’t. After the assaults, President Bush stated we could desire to constantly use restraint and intelligence interior the pursuit of Osama. Bombing Afghanistan replaced into like blowing up your place to seize a rat; the living house gets destroyed and the rat only runs down yet another hollow. i think Kerry or the different Democrat could have used endurance and reticence till he knew he ought to seize Osama, no longer bypass blowing up a u . s . and finally end up empty surpassed. He could have used the lower back door attitude; lobbed some bombs, allowed Osama to fall right into a pretend sense of protection then used our intelligence businesses to seize or kill him. No he wouldn’t have invaded a sovereign u . s . like Iraq with none reason as Bush did. Our economic gadget could have persisted to advance as background proves it does under maximum Democratic leaders (different than Carter).
2016-12-10 04:20:58 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kerry is nothing but a lying scumbag. I think that the world would be much worse. He only says what you want to hear. And then later does what he wants to do.
2006-07-10 16:14:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Kerry had won the headlines would read....
EXTRA EXTRA
CHARGES TO BE BROUGHT TO HIGH PROFILE WAR PROFITEERS, AS CONGRESS HOLDS HEARINGS.
2006-07-10 16:18:02 · answer #6 · answered by nefariousx 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The lesser of the two evils has been chosen!
2006-07-10 16:25:09 · answer #7 · answered by L 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the world would turn 2 hell
2006-07-10 16:13:02 · answer #8 · answered by Miss Romantic 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have moved to the UK or something
2006-07-10 16:14:25 · answer #9 · answered by cherryvalleyheart 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋