That's a whole other country every country has there own president and problems.Who really cares what he did in the past that's there business.Just like north korea why don't we just go in there like we did iraq and start war with them.
2006-07-10 16:04:19 · 13 answers · asked by identityhopeless 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
How come we didn't go to war first with Osama bin ladens crew first since they said they did it
2006-07-10 16:06:04 · update #1
No, it is very wrong to let our soldiers die every day to secure oil fields.
No, we cannot invade North Korea because they have real weapons that can start a nuclear war.
2006-07-10 16:09:38 · answer #1 · answered by news101now 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Was it right for...
....Saddam to murder over 300,000 Kurds?
....Iraq to invade Kuwait?
....Iraq to shoot at coalition planes in the no-fly zones?
....Iraq to support and finance the families of suicide bombers who hit Israel?
....Iraq to violate over 17 U.N. resolutions that were passed by the security council and an overwhelming international majority?
....France, Russia, and some U.N. members to be involved in the "Food or Oil" scandal (explaining motive to be against war)?
Don't forget who you're defending there, Cochran. You can pick whatever side of the war you want to be on. If you pick Saddam, then you probably would have been against stopping the Holocaust as long as it didn't leave Germany.
On the other front, the U.S. can only be faulted with being too patient with Saddam, letting him stay in power after the first Gulf War. We backed the threats carefully worded in each and every U.N. resolution that he violated. It is completely ridiculous for anyone with a sense of logic to think the situation could have been diplomatically resolved. And if you didn't think financing Palestinian terrorists was bad, you probably didn't think he was capable of using terrorist connections to strike at others in the future.
One word for ya..."naive"
2006-07-10 23:23:51 · answer #2 · answered by SirCharles 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We didn't start the war, Saddam did. He had 17 chances, 17, to comply with the U.N., and he balked on all of them. North Korea is running out of chances. If Japan goes through with their resolution, Kim Jong Il has said that is an act of war. Then, and only then will you see The United States take him out. The proverbial ball is in his court, and time is running out. Let's all hope he doesn't miss his shot.
2006-07-10 23:19:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh definatly - in fact lets kill everyoine that's not an american and finnaly have some peace around here!!!
When we went into war without UN approval we broke international law, we did the same thing Hitler did to Poland - regardless of internal politics in Iraq, we took there country, hope we give it back
2006-07-11 06:51:24 · answer #4 · answered by ryandebraal 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's never right to start a war. That's why both sides are always saying "they started it!" In this case, the US government says Saddam started it by keeping mythological weapons, but the US didn't start it by sending most of their military over there and opening fire.
And yeah, my vote would have been to send everyone after Osama. He blew up the WTC and in my books that means he started it.
2006-07-10 23:07:13 · answer #5 · answered by Hillbillies are... 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK, first of all we're not at war with Iraq.....secondly, monday morning quarterbacking is not a good policy and hindsight is 20/20
2006-07-11 01:54:36 · answer #6 · answered by wahoophil1 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did not agree with the war from the beginning, especially because we went in there without hardly any allied support.
2006-07-10 23:08:38 · answer #7 · answered by confetticupcakes 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All we are saaaaayin' is give war a chaaaance!
All we are saaaaayin' is give war a chaaaance!
No we're not plaaaayin' just give war a chaaaance!
Shootin' an slaaaaayin' please give war a chaaaaaance!
Don't be so gaaaayin' an GIVE WAR A CHAAAAAAANCE!
2006-07-10 23:08:45 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The US did attack Ossama first that was the whole afghan/ taliban thing...they just didn't finish the job.
2006-07-10 23:10:39 · answer #9 · answered by dude 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That was voted on by the UN secirity councel.. before any one went anywhere.
2006-07-10 23:08:50 · answer #10 · answered by ole_lady_93 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋