English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-10 15:38:44 · 36 answers · asked by Donald W 1 in Politics & Government Politics

36 answers

When she ran it the first time the budget was balanced and our debt was being payed off for the first time in over 40 years. We were not at war with 2 countries and on the brink of 2 more. Gas was not 3.00 a gallon.

Yes I would vote for her. But for most of America to get on board I think that she should first run as Vice President

2006-07-10 15:49:39 · answer #1 · answered by Layla 6 · 2 1

I think she would be great, she has the smarts and the expeirience from being the first lady, but Al Gore could do a better job. She would certainly do a better job than Captian Tinyballs (bush) and it would be cool to see a female president, so yes, i think Hilary Clinton could run the United States Government

2006-07-10 15:43:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not by herself, no of course not. But could she be president, oh yes, most likely. Would this be bad? Taking advice from her pothead husband? Maybe. I mean, how many times a week do you think George W is calling his father? Hillary might be compelled to finish something her husband started or screwed up, like universal health care. However, I'm sure that Mrs. Clinton won't be sticking cigars inside anybody's anatomy.

2006-07-10 15:42:24 · answer #3 · answered by Fun and Games 4 · 0 0

the only thing that was accomplished when slick willie was in office was create distractions in Bosnia Hersigovina to cover up his sex scandels. Did anyone else seem to notice that the night before the trial, a Missle from the US controled area around there found its way into a civilian suburb?!?!? And to be posed with the question of Hillary in office... anyone who is even half way capeable of using any ounce of thought what-so-ever should be able to tell you that its not a question of "Could" so much as "Should". We all know her to be unable to have a healthy marage much less control over our country.

2006-07-10 15:50:17 · answer #4 · answered by righttackle63 2 · 0 0

Yes, if she were allowed to. Her policies would probably help alot more people. But that is not what the ruling class wants you know like how the right wing and the American Medical Association went crazy when she thought everyone should have access to basic medical care.

2006-07-10 15:41:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Absolutely...I mean look at Chimpy he isn't even half as smart as Hillary...After, 4yrs. of daddy BUSH, 8yrs. of Chimpy, 8yrs of Bill Clinton. I just think that 4-8 more of Hillery is just a bit much(to much nepotism)...We need new blood!

2006-07-10 15:49:25 · answer #6 · answered by Meemers 3 · 0 0

She already has, it was her turn with Slick Billy. She blew it because while she put forth a national healthcare plan, she couldn't let go of her connections to the corporations and fat cats who make money on our current 'sick' care system.

Her husband was the best Republican president we ever had. Just check the records.

2006-07-10 15:43:23 · answer #7 · answered by auntiegrav 6 · 0 0

Just another failed democrat, and not nearly as competent. She hasn't the leadership skill her husband had. She doesnt have a prayer, It would activate the republican and Christian and Pro lifer in such large number that any republican running against her would win in a landslide..

2006-07-10 15:55:48 · answer #8 · answered by mr.phattphatt 5 · 0 0

Yes

2006-07-10 15:39:40 · answer #9 · answered by Professor Chaos386 4 · 0 0

She is wiling and she is able. Yes. The real question is: WHO really wants to come in and fix the broken economy, goverment deficit, war, ethical issues in Washington, and all that mambo jambo that is taking place whith the current administration?

2006-07-10 15:44:29 · answer #10 · answered by aaraat5 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers