English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Answer as you wish, Thx.

2006-07-10 14:36:33 · 25 answers · asked by Elusive 5 in Politics & Government Politics

I know what President Clinton did, come on, THINK it through.

2006-07-10 14:41:32 · update #1

Judging by the answers so far, I think we're in big trouble.

2006-07-10 14:48:56 · update #2

25 answers

Bush doesn't have any skills along with his herd. North Korea's million man military is a definite problem since they really do have the nuclear technology. America has a 2 million man military that is spread out all over the place trying to conceal Bush's wars going on all over the place. South Korea isn't to fond of getting over ran by North Korea, and the 30,000 U.S. troops stationed in South Korea isn't going to stop them if they ever did anything. The Capitalist Corporate slave labor is the only thing the Corporations are wanting to keep alive. Communist China also has interests in North Korea, and guess what they are all Asians...What a mess George Bush has gotten America into. I ask are more American people expendable along with the expendable Asians now? Neocons don't fight wars they just start them..

2006-07-11 10:48:30 · answer #1 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 16 2

How about it Prof, repuke's can't you still feel the love. Clinton was the last legally elected president and was the most successful in over 40 years at the business of running the country, he was one of the most popular while doing the job. Yes he probably would be able to negotiate better then the present administration. As a matter of fact we should examine just exactly what Bush and his foreign policy has done for the U. S., we are at war, a war started on a lie. We have not caught the perpetrator of 9/11. We are hated by more then half of the people of the world. I am scared **** less at what is going to happen to all of Asia if Bush negotiates with N. Korea.

2006-07-10 15:00:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think the point you are trying to get to here is that Clinton was, and always will be, a better negotiator than Bush. Clinton was always on top of things (pun intended) while Bush needs to wait for news to "trickle down" through his advisors. Democrats always have been better at negotiating peace than waging war. Peace would be the better option in this case.

Have you noticed the hatred spewing from the other side whenever you mention Clinton being better than Bush at something? We could always call Jimmy Carter. He's an excellent negotiator when his efforts aren't undermined...

2006-07-11 04:33:03 · answer #3 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0 0

How about Carter? He seems to have the best diplomacy of all of them. Clinton saw that and they worked together on several occasions. And by the way, to the guy who is blaming Clinton for Nafta, George Sr. was the one who pushed for Nafta so hard and a republican congress passed it.
Did you ever get a good look at Republican women, like Anne Coulter and Barbara Bush? Is it any wonder these republicans are so upset that Clinton got a bj? Jealousy is an ugly thing.

2006-07-12 22:00:26 · answer #4 · answered by Hillaryforpresident 5 · 0 0

Soooooo.... are you another one of these morons who blame BUSH for Korea deciding they want to point missiles at people?? Well, he is doing just fine in dealing with the situation. As far as calling Clinton, he NEVER had this Countries best interest at heart, he sucked while "in office" what makes you think it would be any better now? He's a worthless "has been", who never really was!! The only one who would disagree is Monica!

2006-07-10 14:50:03 · answer #5 · answered by Katz 6 · 0 0

Clinton 's concessions led us where we are today, and I don't think the Bush Administration is criminal, though you'd believe it was if you really listened to most of the media. President Bush will deal with the "little man" just fine, I'm certain.

2006-07-10 14:51:44 · answer #6 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0 0

We can't do a thing about North Korea, because we are spending all the money and our troops in this stupid Iraq war. So Clinton F**** Monica, at least he didn't screw the whole country and the world like Bush and his cronies! Wake up!

2006-07-10 14:54:12 · answer #7 · answered by tonit45 2 · 0 0

Call Clinton so he can bend over again, just like in 1994? Are you for real? Don't you learn from history? Appeasement does not work with rogue regimes. When will Dems understand that getting tough with losers like Kim Jong Il is necessary. Instead you want to write him checks and send him food aid which inevitably wind's up in the mouths of his army and cronies.

Go ahead and call Bill and watch him get on his knees for Kim Jong Il, just like Monica.

2006-07-10 14:46:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You mean the same Clinton that gave the original go ahead to the North Koreans to build the Nuke power plant in 1994?

You must be North Korean

2006-07-10 14:43:27 · answer #9 · answered by freebird 6 · 0 0

And you think that Clinton is an authority on the subject why? He's the one that got us into this situation. He gave North Korea the time, money and technology to make these nuclear missiles. He also gave the technology to China.

You are another stupid liberal.

2006-07-10 14:40:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your stupidy shows in every word of your question. First off President Bush is taking the high road with diplomatic relations along with 10 other countries. President Clinton is the one who gave cool water and other dangerous info to the chinese, who in turn give it to other communist nations. I colud go on but I don't think you get it .

2006-07-10 14:42:11 · answer #11 · answered by amglo1 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers