What I mean to say is, it appears to be that all living things all are evolving \ improving \ becoming more complex until they eventually achieve a state so advanced that they can rejoin back with the power\creator that created it. This is what has been seen in nature since recorded time. It seems like such a logical progression actually. Eventually everything must evolve to a point where it can join with the creator\the power that started it all. Maybe we are all a part of the creator all trying to find our way back to the top of the chain again and the top level learns from all our experiences and then creates a new BIG BANG to start it all over again, with slightly changed objectives. I find this fascinating to think about. Comments?
2006-07-10 14:24:04 · 9 answers · asked by Tom Elgin 1 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
I saw a 1900's picture of a goat taking a crap; the goat certainly has not evolved. But you are only speaking of theory, which is called the practice of science. So a double false still equals zero.
Actually physics makes more sense.
2006-07-22 19:23:44 · answer #1 · answered by BM 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if wanting to become something like the Borg on star Trek is the answer, but Becoming more evolved? EH...I have serious doubts, as we are destroying this planet as it is, I find it hard to believe we as humans are evolving, just so much war. Although the BIg Bang was violent by nature, things are just getting ridiculously digusting.
2006-07-24 04:30:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolve does not equal more complex. Evolve means adapt to an environment. Sometimes, that means simplify (lose hair, obselete an organ).
There is nothing that indicates that evolution has a target. Evolution is merely a short term adaptation for survival. Like breathing. You breath to survive now, but breathing in and of itself has no goal other than short term survival. Breathing a thousand times has no enrichment, except that it kept you alive for a thousand breaths.
2006-07-20 13:51:08 · answer #3 · answered by freebird 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With technological advances in nano-technologies and bio, I think we will evolve to be more machine/computer than human/biological. You do pose an interesting question; but do you think this is a natural repetitive process or evolutionary? If it weren't for natural disaster killing off the dinosaurs, mammals may not have evolved to the point they are now..
2006-07-10 14:31:38 · answer #4 · answered by dexidus 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't know about the creator, but complexity of life is a result of natural selection. Complex life forms have a greater chance at survival.
2006-07-10 14:28:40 · answer #5 · answered by dgrhm 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
your saying more Complex equals perfection. Now that is comparing apples and oranges and trying to get veges
2006-07-10 14:39:55 · answer #6 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep
2006-07-24 06:19:54 · answer #7 · answered by wthmassage 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes in a way.
2006-07-23 14:06:49 · answer #8 · answered by *~~*~~*KIba's Girl*~~*~~* 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is the whole purpose of life. That's why reincarnation.
Our lives will go on, and on.....
2006-07-22 17:28:03 · answer #9 · answered by Cookie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋