What first person shooter is more realistic BattleField (Any Version) or Counter-Strike (Any Version).?

Question

ONLY FOR THESE TWO GAMES PLEASE

Answer 1

Neither... Call of Duty 2 (xBox 360) is the most realistic there is.

Answer 2

of the two, i would have to say the Battlfield is more realistic, as in the abilities you have, like driving vehicles and flying planes. I liked CS better due to the speed at which you can play it, and the lack of diversions (vehicles, etc). If you want to play a quicker game i would play CS. The other posters are correct that Call to Duty 2 is much more realistic than either of the games you listed.

Answer 3

Do you have to ask!??!?! Battlefield 2.

Lots of people, two teams, two commanders who have access to certain assest, can make squads that can communicate to the commander.

Then of course the real wepons, vehicals, and all the different kits you use along w/their corresponding abilities.

While CounterStrike has physics, like pushing a barrel over and crap, it has nothing on realism and options (all the different stuff you can do besides just kill) that Battlefield offers.

I didn't like 1st person shooters until Battlefield 2.

Answer 4

Halo: try against developed Halo:2 Left 4 lifeless Left 4 lifeless 2 Portal Portal 2 0.5 life 2 Counter Strike team fort 2 call Of accountability: Black Ops II and something of them Minecraft

Answer 5

neither..try America's Army: Rise of a Soldier..now that game is really realistic

Answer 6

i would say the more realistic one would be battlefield but i dont mind playing counterstrike source.

Answer 7

the most realistic would be battelfeild but they are both good games

Answer 8

neither one.