Hmmmm....
2006-07-10 13:38:53 · 21 answers · asked by Tay Tay 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There are things about this administration that I agree with and things that quite frankly, tick me off.
9/11 would have happened regardless. Do you really think that a plan like that could be conceived of, trained for, practiced, financed and executed in 10 months??? (consider Bush was elected in mid-Nov, inaugurated in January and it happened in September)
2006-07-10 13:45:46 · answer #1 · answered by Miss Vicki 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Honey... Bush is a great President. The last President with balls before him was freakin' Reagan. September 11 actually happened because of Bill Clinton. If you know your economics and how they relate to the presidency, then you'd know that a President's policies actually take effect the 8 years or so AFTER his presidency. The only reason Clinton had it easy was because Senior Bush did all the work. Or did you think that "sexual relations" in the Oval Office fixed anuthing? The reason this Bush's presidency is so full of stressful and tragic situations is because of Clinton's incompetence. I STILL CAN'T BELIEVE HOW EVERYONE HAS FORGOTTEN OSAMA'S ATTACKS ON U.S. EMBASSIES IN AFRICA WHILE CLINTON WAS IN OFFICE!!! He made his Al-Qaeda agenda VERY clear then, and Clinton didn't believe him and ignored it!!! All he DID (check it for yourself) was shoot a couple of missles into the desert and told him to stop harrassing people. THAT'S IT!!! His lack of leadership and responsibility as Commander in Chief only fueled the terrorist's confidence that they could pull of 9/11. I am appalled that Bush get's all the negative crap, when he is the one that is actually trying to fix Clinton's mess. I mean, the guy never really did anything except get head and kiss babies in public... in fact, Hillary was the one that had any power and she didn't do anything either. He was whipped, and she only let 9/11 plots slide by so she could have something to attack for her future run for President... at the expense of the lives of the people that got killed by terrorist attacks... If Bush wasn't president, then... bless our hearts... terrorists would have the morale and confidence to attack us here on our own land... Or do you seriously think Al Gore would even know what to do? That guy would be more concerned with how terrorism is affecting the environment than what it's doing to humanity... AND as for Kerry: Who would you rather vote for as President: A great Governor (Bush) or an incompetent Senator? You have your answer: He's in the White House... And I don't like to hear all that fuss about votes and popular vote. That system was invented by our fore-fathers... to those people, I say: pack your bags and move to Communist Cuba if it's so bad here...
2006-07-10 13:55:17 · answer #2 · answered by Mexi Poff 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is the worst excuse for a president the United States has ever had. 9/11 would have happened anyway. A more astute leader might have had people in office who would have taken seriously the reports that there was going to be an attack on the U.S. and I'm sure that Gore would have gone after Al Quaida in Afghanistan. Gore would not have gone after Iraq because Saddam was pretty well boxed up there and the inspectors found no grounds for the criminal pre-emptive attack that the idiot in the White House forced on us.
2006-07-10 13:48:24 · answer #3 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have no opinion on our president but I will say that 9/11 was planned long before Bush ever became president, 9/11 was not his fault.
2006-07-10 13:42:34 · answer #4 · answered by arctic_scrap 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush...blah
The attacks on 9/11 had been in the planning stages since the mid 90s. It would have happened no matter who was president.
2006-07-10 13:42:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think 9/11 would've happened regardless of who was president. But I do think that a different president could handle the war with Iraq a lot better then Bush did?
2006-07-10 13:42:03 · answer #6 · answered by lillady 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
9-11 would have happened anyway. There are people who hate us. If those haters would channel that hate into helping mankind instead of trying to destroy us, there would be much less problems in this world. I personally like Bush, I think he has been put into a position unlike any other President before him. There is no roadmap to follow in this world of terrorism, he must find his way and that involves trial and error. I think he does the best he can.
2006-07-10 13:46:29 · answer #7 · answered by Brainiac 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tay, 9/11 was planned long before Bush became President.
2006-07-10 13:41:54 · answer #8 · answered by Albannach 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a fan of Bush.
9/11 probably would've happened reguardless..
lisafiddlr- That wasn't Bin Laden. It was Ramsey Youseff and 5 other conspirators. ALL were thrown in jail in 1997 for life!
Where do ya'll keep getting this??
Here, see for yourself!!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center#February_26.2C_1993_bombing
2006-07-10 13:42:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Bush is a leader. He doesn't take the pulse of the nation (stupid masses) when he decided what needs to be done to protect the country.
Yes it would have happened anyway.... 1993 WTC happened under Clinton - 1 year after he was elected. Was he responsible for that? No one seems to think he was to blame for that bombing. Blaming Bush is stupid and pointless. Blame Osama and the assholes who took over the plane. Keep your hatred focused on those who carried out the attacks, not those who didn't stop it. (including Clinton failures)
2006-07-10 13:42:00 · answer #10 · answered by Genie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋