English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Which ones of these provide you with the greatest admiration:
Inaction in Sudan
Inaction in Rawanda
Inaction in the Balkans
Inaction in Somalia
Inaction and meaningless resolutions for 12 years with Iraq
Inaction and meaningless resolutions and inspections with Iran
Inaction and meaningless resolutions with N. Korea

And please remember, most of this happened during your Prince of Peace Clinton.

2006-07-10 11:05:10 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

Their brains are too small to wrap around anything.

Besides to them it all Bush's fault. I know, I know like you said most of this was under Clinton's watch. But that must simply be a Karl Rove trick.

2006-07-10 11:08:37 · answer #1 · answered by tm_tech32 4 · 0 1

Because of all the positive things they've done? How's this for a question: Why do you continue to support the U.S.? Which one of these provides you with the greatest admiration?:

-Invasion of a country that was no threat to us, has created more terrorists than existed beforehand, has cost to date tens of thousands of lives and has severely affected our standing in the world?
-Vast amounts of government revenue spent on defense, much much more than any other country (and in fact more than every other country combined) and yet when three planes are hijacked we can't even get a few jet fighters off the ground?
-Sanctions imposed on Iraq that cost at least hundreds of thousands of lives, at least half of which were children? (also of note, the cancer rate in Iraq skyrocketed after the first Gulf War, because of missiles used by us that had a depleted uranium core, and these sanctions prevented the medicine needed from reaching the people affected. Kind of a double whammy, if you will.)
-Support of Israel, a country that since September of 2000 has killed 3,978 Palestinians, over three times the amount of Israelis that have died because of Palestinians?
-The nuclear attacks on Japan that killed over a million innocent people when there was no reason for it? (The "millions of US soldiers would've died if we'd invaded" myth is absolutely false, Japan was defeated, the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were simply cowardly ways of warning Stalin's regime)

The list goes on but my question is only half a thought because it ignores all the positive things the U.S. has done, and that's exactly the situation with your question. This bickering of yours is useless and helps no one, and neither is the bickering of people "on the left." Come on.

2006-07-10 18:29:45 · answer #2 · answered by dropkick_murphy9 2 · 1 0

I disagree with one thing about what you said. It isn't UN inaction that gets people killed it's UN action. I can't think of one thing that the UN has done that hasn't been a complete disaster.

2006-07-10 18:16:52 · answer #3 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 0 0

You just can't let Clinton go can you? He just absolutely HAUNTS you doesn't he! You are pathetic.

2006-07-10 18:08:24 · answer #4 · answered by Who cares 5 · 0 0

Their brains are very stretchy, like rubber bands. lol

2006-07-10 18:15:25 · answer #5 · answered by a.fricker 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers