2006-07-10 10:33:26 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Sexual jolts disrupt Manhattan physician Bill Harford's equilibrium. At an elegant Christmas party, two "models" hit on him, he watches a Lothario try to pick up his tipsy wife, he aids a woman sprawled naked in a bathroom after an overdose. The next night, his wife reveals sexual fantasies with a stranger; a dead patient's daughter throws herself at him; as he walks, brooding, six teen boys hurl homophobic insults at him; a streetwalker takes him to her flat; he interrupts men having a sex party with a girl barely in her teens. His odyssey, which next takes him into a world of wealthy sex play at a masked ball of hedonism, threatens his life, his self-respect, and his marriage.
2006-07-10 18:16:39 · answer #1 · answered by moviemike3 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sucks. that detailed enough for ya! Don't understand why actors have to do "ARTY" films....especially the ones nobody can freakin' understand.
2006-07-22 12:05:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why? It was a weird, boring mess and if it hadn't been directed by Kubrick no one would have seen it! Don't strain your brain trying to figure it out.
2006-07-11 00:22:09 · answer #3 · answered by Danger, Will Robinson! 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why would anyone want to explain this movie. IT REALLY DID SUCK.
2006-07-10 17:42:24 · answer #4 · answered by dolfan 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
lots of nudity. stupid piano music of a single chord striking. it sucked.
2006-07-10 17:44:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
stupid, sex filled, awful movie- - total waste of time
2006-07-10 17:35:20 · answer #6 · answered by texasgirl5454312 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋