Lets have another world war?

Question

Wars always kept populations down. Now the Human race are like cockroaches consuming all natural resources and it's going to end in disaster! Let's ban nucluer weapons and have a good clean fight with someone!

Sorry Jack, but here's the point. The girl's answer after you says 'in ww2, 6 million people died because of who knows why'. It took 8 answers to show my true point! Now I'm worried about N.Korea if people have forgotten about ww2 already

jonny speed
Do not confuse genocide with population control please. It's devastating to my case!

Answer 1

Wow. Satire is lost on you people. This guy's not an ignorant psycopath, just clever.


I can see how it's easy to confuse the two, though.
;-)

Answer 2

NOOOO
A better idea would be to, first find more sources of energy and then to educate people to be.. smart and have less children, that way they can be brought up better because the parents could focus all their energy on them. The Celestine prophesy is a novel that, even if its just a story talks about how, when the human race has evolved completely, they will understand the need to get the population down, and will learn to take advantage of all the natural resources while keeping a balance, WITHOUT KILLING because intelligent people understand the value of human life.
The war not only kills people, it kills the survivor's souls as well, My grandparents lost all during the war and the worst wasn't what they lost, but the horror of seeing their families gone missing, killed, tortured, because something they had nothing to do with, seeing your family suffering because someone else wanted to, and living with fear for years after it, you're glad you're alive but feel guilty because they didn't make it .
Humans should be more intelligent than that.
I think your question is offencive to all those who have lost someone (or everything ), in a war makes it sound like war was at least a bit useful, thanks to all the murders. If that wasn't what you meant, you should have put it differently,
And, I know WW3 in on already, just shows you how far behind in evolution some countries are

Answer 3

Better yet, let's declare war on ignorance. Then, people would stop producing so many kids because they'll realize the problems of overpopulation, stop destroying the planet through pollutants because they'll see the effects, and stop waging wars because they'll understand that life is suffering and to seek it out is the same as having a mental handicap. And, sixty million people died in WWII, and the reason was a guy who thought war and population control was acceptable and convinced millions of followers. His name was Hitler. I think he'd agree with your plan, but of course, he had a bunker. Where will you go when the bombs start falling?

Answer 4

Instead of spending millions to have a war to reduce population heres an idea why not spend that money on prevention. If we educate the world not just the lucky people, it could help reduce the spread of illness, reduce the amount of unwanted pregnancies, reduce the amount of waste products. EDUCATION IS WHAT WE NEED NOT WAR. After each war the poor got poorer and the rest were left to savagely reclaim what they thought they deserved. Where would you fall in the aftermath?

Answer 5

Hold on and put your rambo knife back under your pillow again. Bird flu is becoming transmissible any day now and will wipe out 50 % of the infected. Also, most streptococci (meat eating bactaria) are rapidly becoming resistent to penicillin. The rest will die early of aids or diabetes from being overweight. Don't underestimate the grim love of Mother Nature.

Answer 6

ok to answer ur question, world wars may initially cause a population drop, bt if the second world war didnt occur and germany and CO were allowed to continue with their genocides then the population would have decreased ova time....world wars generally occur with the intention of ridding the world with as much evil as one can plausibly rid. therefore insted of havin a world war, we cn jst let it be, and slowly destroy each other, which will in the long run, reduce human population remarkably,

mayb..

morbid enuff?
;)

Answer 7

YES i agree a good old fashioned spring clean of the sub human species lets just create apocalypse and get it over with, we could do with totally destroying the emp field around the world because then we would be shoved straight into chaos, i agree lets do a bloody big one this time.

Answer 8

This is a good idea. Conscript the 18 to 25 age group, to give them something to do and to fight for their country with honour and dignity. Wars breed invention and courage as well as depleting populations and, regardless of the outcomes, we have the opportunity to start again. it can't be any worse than it is now...........

Answer 9

That has to be the stupidest question/statement I have ever heard. Yeah wars keep population down but in world war two 6 million people died becuase of who knows why. i do agree that we are consuming the world and we should stop destroying everything for more people but.....a war is stupid, you should write letter to your state congress. I also agree that we should ban nuclear weapons.....but we already tried that. DUH!

Answer 10

It must be very sad for you, seeing negative ways of conserving the world when with decent leaders and a modicum of common sense we could sort ourselves out. Greed for various things, material goods, power etc is the problem.

Answer 11

the 1918 flu epidemic killed 10 times more people than the first world war.. TEN TIMES. Nature can swat us like flies any time she wants to.