2006-07-10 09:01:59 · 85 answers · asked by dopeysaurus 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Accident but caused by pursuit by paparazzi photographers. Would be called "involuntary manslaughter" in the USA.
2006-07-10 09:03:08 · answer #1 · answered by Sir J 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Murder
2006-07-15 02:28:16 · answer #2 · answered by Lema 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Murder
2006-07-10 09:04:07 · answer #3 · answered by AsianPersuasion :) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Murder
2006-07-10 09:04:05 · answer #4 · answered by experience 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Accident
2006-07-10 09:10:47 · answer #5 · answered by Shamus O sean 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Accident
2006-07-10 09:06:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was an accident. I saw a documentary about it, and it was an accident. I heard that the driver of the car was drunk and that Diana wasn't wearing a seat belt the car lost control when it was going on the street ant it crashed into something.
2006-07-10 09:07:47 · answer #7 · answered by pctypa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Murder.
2006-07-15 20:07:06 · answer #8 · answered by msianmania 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't imagine the Royal Family was very happy about a future king's step-father being Dodi Al-Fayed. Also, it was rumored that Diana was pregnant with his illigitemate child at the time. It couldn't have been an accident. It was all too perfect.
2006-07-10 09:07:45 · answer #9 · answered by EvilFairies 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Henri Paul was pissed out of his skull, doing a hundred and something through tight little city streets! Diana wasn't wearing a seatbelt! Neither was Dodi! One survivor, one seatbelt. One conclusion.
And if you were going to murder someone driving a Merc, would you have chosen a Fiat Uno with which to take them on?
2006-07-10 09:06:51 · answer #10 · answered by wild_eep 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Murder; but it was looked at as an accident.
2006-07-11 10:57:25 · answer #11 · answered by Priscilla 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋