please no snowflakes and icecrystals these RANDOM geometry in nature and not PERFECT.
2006-07-10 08:47:29 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
Yes. The nautilus shell is one.
The DaVinci Code also talks about more references to perfect geometry in nature, but this one is the only one I can remember off the top of my head.
2006-07-10 09:49:17 · answer #1 · answered by j.f. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why does existence want perfect geometry? How can this be so? have you ever by no potential heard of Heisenberg's Uncertainty theory? regardless of if an merchandise is acceptable on the macro scale it would not be perfect on the micro scale. in ordinary words the mathematical equation is acceptable and on a philosophical aspect you ought to even argue antagonistic to that. regardless of the indisputable fact that, your argument would not easily cheap sensible layout as there is not any reason to assume sensible layout ought to call for perfection (even although i imagine sensible layout is fairly fabricated and flawed, yet for added perfect causes than that it calls for perfection).
2016-11-06 03:59:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's no such thing as absolutely, positively PERFECT geometry anywhere in the universe. Well, at least that we know of. Everlything has the smallest bump or bend in the outer edge.
2006-07-10 09:01:02 · answer #3 · answered by picsnap 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I belive honecomb is or comes close It was once proposed as a basis for measurment
2006-07-10 09:00:48 · answer #4 · answered by ragapple 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pretty perfect if you ask me.
http://goldennumber.net/neophite.htm
2006-07-10 08:53:14 · answer #5 · answered by craftman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It most certainly does. I cant think of an example offhand, but I have seen evidence of it.
2006-07-10 08:52:30 · answer #6 · answered by chris s 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋