Didn't he win that one fair and square, no questions asked?
Didn't he get BOTH the popular vote AND the electoral vote?
or is it just dems still being bitter about the 2000 election (which after all was said and done, still turned out in favor of Bush)?
2006-07-10 07:36:08 · 11 answers · asked by Aidan316 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
sugar brown - of COURSE you don't care what the republicans say...
maybe if you DID, you'd have a better understanding of whats going on in this country...
just cause i voted for Bush doesn't mean i DON'T care what the dems have to say...
please, people...don't be ignorant.
Know both sides, cause without it, you ARE ignorant.
If that offends you, then...well, it should.
If it makes you more aware...then, well...good.
2006-07-10 09:40:39 · update #1
prettyinpink...
gas is sky high?
You are spoiled...ask england how much there gas is...and their president isn't bush.
2006-07-10 09:42:01 · update #2
The word you are looking for is animosity, compounded with blind rage and hatred.
Such is the mantra of today’s American left, “We are the intelligent elite! If we lose we were cheated by those underling backward hicks that should bow in awe at the mere mention of our names!” It was their administrations that initiated the currently used intelligence gathering methods decrying conservative concerns at the time as paranoid and attempted to put into question their loyalty. Today when America uses what They initiated it is infringing on the rights (of terrorists I suspect) and what they started is now so vile that, America Must Come To Them For Salvation! Self righteous, criminal, hypocrites all.
2006-07-10 08:41:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was certainly done more efficiently than in 2000, when he had to get the Supreme Court to stop the counting in Florida.
It's very easy for Republicans to steal an election without doing a single thing to the ballots, and it was done in Ohio. It was done here in North Carolina to get Jesse Helms reelected in 1986.
All they have to do is turn the voting in every urban county in a given state into an hellacious mess. Long lines, slow registrars, incorrect information spread to voters. For every person in Ohio who got into a long line and said to hell with it, that was half a vote for Bush.
And it didn't help that the CEO of Diebold, who made the Ohio voting machines without a paper trail, promised Bush would win the state.
There was less trouble 50 years ago when all there were were paper ballots. Paper can't be hacked by an evil computer genius.
And do you really honestly think Bush got nine million more votes the second time than he did the first? I never met ONE single person who said he didn't vote for Bush in 2000 but did in 2004.
2006-07-10 14:42:59 · answer #2 · answered by wmp55 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds to me like you're not asking a question, your making statements in a form of a sarcastic question, you kinda already have your mind made up on this one. When it all boils down, you know deep inside that Bush stole the election, hell he stole both of them, I think that it's better to say that he stole it especially considering the fact that the state of the world "sucks" right now. People can hardly afford to go any place because gas is sky high, and the democrates have absolutly NOTHING to do with that. Or maybe we should just give all of the credit for this huge mishap to the Republicans. Peace 2 u!
2006-07-10 14:54:53 · answer #3 · answered by prettyinpink 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's just the loonely-left that can't get over the fact that most people don't agree with them. Therefore, all the rest of us "must" be stupid and/or Bush "stole" the election(s).
If the Democratic party wants to get back on track, they need to kick the looney-left out. Get rid of the leftists, the socialist, the radical environmentalists, and the anti-americans and send them back to their third-party hell. Only then can the Democratic party become the once great party it was - the party of great and loyal Americans such as JFK, Truman, and FDR.
2006-07-10 14:45:53 · answer #4 · answered by Jolly1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How the 2000 election turn out in Bush's favour? Katherine Harris giving him a BJ now?
2006-07-10 14:41:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are quite right.
They are still bitter, and unable to deal with the truth of the matter, that the majority of voters voted for President Bush.
Even when I was completely fed up with President Clinton and his antics, I still gave him the respect due to his office.
The bitter, mindless libs refuse to do that with President Bush.
2006-07-10 16:03:45 · answer #6 · answered by Leah 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, you are right. Democrats still like to say the election was "stolen" so they can get the sympathy vote in 2008.
2006-07-10 14:43:47 · answer #7 · answered by C's mom 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The question has been rendered academic. He is now The National Blessing.
2006-07-10 14:40:26 · answer #8 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's called bitterness on the part of most democrats.....Liberals are not very good losers.
2006-07-10 21:54:35 · answer #9 · answered by whichwayisup 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
he did, he did ,he did....i dont care what those republicans say
2006-07-10 14:39:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋