I wasn't aware The United States was involved in a "holy war about oil profits." To my knowledge, the only wars we are fighting are with terrorists in Afghanistan and with enemies of our ally Iraq. I know we will win those two, but we should never go to a war for religious reasons or oil profits. I wonder why the news never reports about this supposed "holy war about oil profits?
As far as global warming goes, no one denies that it is happening, or that humans play a roll in perpetuating it. The problem is, no one is sure how much humans affect global warming. There is no majority of scientists taking either side. If anyone actually bothered to do research on the matter, they would find an equal amount of scientists that say humans only slightly affect global warming as opposed to greatly affect it. The sad thing is, a lot of people only listen to the one side saying we are all going to ruin the Earth in x amount of years. There is no proof that will happen, only a lot of speculation. Even if we do, the Earth is going no where, the people are, the Earth will be just fine.
2006-07-10 11:02:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't exactly understand your question. The answer however is probably the same reason some people cant pull there head out of there *** and see the real evidence that the Bush family has had shady dealings in the past with the Bin Laden family and more than likely are involved in the 911 cover up. There are stories with well documented sources that go way back before 911 and highlight some of these dealings. Sources like The Washington Post, The London Guardian, New York Times, Associated Press. These sources are usually considered legitimate on any thing they report except this topic. How can this be?? All the "neocons" (your words) will quickly reference these sources when they have a story that supports the administration. Check out some of the "conspiracy" websites like www.scholorsfor911truth.com, www.whatreallyhappened.com look for 911 time lines
2006-07-10 07:07:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by captpcb216 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You throw comments out there and don't substantiate them. Have we taken a drop of oil from Iraq? What Scientists are you talking about? You didn't even mention what scientists are saying is a legitimate problem. I will guess it's Global Warming, especially with the leading Democratic scientist having just made a movie about it. I'm sure it is a problem, but not necessarily a President Bush problem, this has been an issue for years. It amazes me how you blame President Bush for everything, damn, all I blamed Former President Clinton for was not being able to keep his zipper up!!!!
What do you do on a personal level for the environment? Do you recycle? Keep an environmentally sound yard ( it is possible)? Drive a car that runs on an alternative fuel? The environment wasn't damaged because of President Bush's neglect, it was ours! Start at home, and stop blaming!!!!
2006-07-10 06:59:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
What phony holy war are you talking about? What oil profits? It just came out a couple of weeks ago that they DID find WMD in Iraq, so the "phony" stuff is passe and incorrect. Also, the contracts for Iraq oil are with France and Russia, not the US, so where's the profit in that?
What "real scientists" are you talking about? If it's "global warming", it came out a couple of months ago that we are in a warming phase after our last ice age, and that it will continue for another couple thousand years. We are also on the upswing of sunspots, which also tends to warm up all the solar system, including ourselves.
You need to do more research before pointing fingers at other people's ignorance.
2006-07-10 06:54:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by PuterPrsn 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sigh....I'll give you that I'm not tickled pink with everything that Bush does, but in all honesty. does it make sense to conclude that this war will get us(or random wealthy americans) more oil? After we leave, the whole Middle East region where we buy oil from is going to be even more ticked off at us. Nothing we do at this point in time will fix that. So we'll prolly get less oil because of it. Wealthy oil companies will have a harder time signing contracts because the oil producers will be more suspicous of any Western peoples. This war produces no oil profits!!!
2006-07-10 06:55:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by spockofvullcan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Phony holy war? Maybe you don't remember 9/11. There is more at stake than just oil. Do you keep up with the news or just watch liberal MTv?
2006-07-10 06:56:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by CW 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Daddy Bush and Saddom where business partners.I surmised,Saddom felt he was getting screwed by Bush,then put a contract on him.They Missed,then Jr. said I'll get you for that.Bush family owns Shell Oil,they buy 98% of all Saudi Oil.So,burning fossil fuels are in their best interest.
2006-07-10 06:56:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most mainstream NEOCONS either can't or won't think issues through opting instead to swallow the party line. The corrupt Bush administration's politics of fear and hate have been hammered into "middle America", this is the problem that I see.
2006-07-10 07:12:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dr.Feelgood 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Please define your terms.
1) What's a neocon? I honestly don't know.
2) Since when has America, with as many different religions as we host, engaged in a Holy War?
3) Which scientists? Name them.
4) What problems? Cite your sources.
You have failed to form a recognizable question, have used vague terms, and failed to advance or support any thesis.
Please edit and re-submit your question.
2006-07-10 06:54:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by silvercomet 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
When will you stop asking phony questions just to make hack political points?
Are you even intelligent? Are you referring to the myth that is global warming? The leading climatologist at MIT says global warming is a charade.
Are you capable of accepting facts that don't instantly reinforced the mucked up propaganda floating inside your brain?
.
... from a non-neocon Leftist who is sick of the putrid deceits of retard 20th Century liberals.
2006-07-10 06:51:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by robabard 5
·
0⤊
0⤋