English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bush refused to sign the internationally agreed upon kyoto treaty that would have reduced emissions greatly. He has basically been big oils best friend , holding hands with saudi prices. His administration has overseen a dramatic decline in environmental progress..

2006-07-10 06:24:46 · 8 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government Politics

Ethan M. - why is our country dependent on dinosaur gas at all ? why arent we investing our scientific minds in to alternative sources of energy like electri power , nuclear, solar , wind , etc etc.....

2006-07-10 06:31:18 · update #1

8 answers

Do your homework before you put your foot in your mouth. WRONG!!!!

2006-07-17 05:30:19 · answer #1 · answered by The Mick "7" 7 · 18 0

Sorry...wrong. Unless the Bush administration destroyed the Aral Sea, I believe the Soviets have the worst environmental record in history.

You might also want to look at who else did not sign Kyoto seeing as how it was drafted in 1997. President Clinton did not sign it, the Senate overwhelmingly voted against it. Why was it only GWBs responsibility to sign it? What about the 17,000 climatologists that signed a petition against it? What about the other nations that also have not signed it. This is a bad law that won't help the environment and most of the world knows it.

2006-07-10 13:31:06 · answer #2 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 0 0

Hes done a great job! Hes the best enviremental friendly president ever ! MY SUV burns more oil now than ever and I am trying to do my part with the greenhouse gases and whatnot. Ill be back, I have to go skin an animal and cut down a tree while Im at it

2006-07-10 13:26:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because the Right-Wing GOP worships money, from the enviromental polluters who have stripped the laws protecting the enviroment & the GOP congress asks the polluters for money to write laws favourable to big corporation polluters.

2006-07-10 13:41:07 · answer #4 · answered by bereftcat 4 · 0 0

Because he doesn't let the pseudo-science wacko's like green peace push him around. These people are anti-growth, anti-business, and anti-American. If not for these nuts we could drill our own oil and not be dependent on terrorist oil.

2006-07-10 13:28:19 · answer #5 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 0 0

...because it would have hurt our economy.

Then liberals would complain about the economy.

Lose lose situation with you pukes.

2006-07-10 13:28:17 · answer #6 · answered by schillinfl2 3 · 0 0

nope...your wrong again!!!

2006-07-10 13:26:32 · answer #7 · answered by DAVER 4 · 0 0

money.

2006-07-10 13:28:02 · answer #8 · answered by Kutekymmee 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers