Afterall, he did supply them with the Nuclear Reactors with only one caveat....don't make bombs.
Admit it. His approach was WRONG.
2006-07-10 06:00:39 · 8 answers · asked by schillinfl2 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
dont expect an honest answer from a lib...
2006-07-10 06:08:05 · answer #1 · answered by smitty031 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The gesture became large. The deal became executed, why placed each and each and every of the stupid spin on it, about Clinton "negotiating the launch", even as all he did became to do a photo op with Kim Jong Il, and escort the girls out of N. Korea. It became in ordinary words the diplomatic attitude if the U. S. attitude N. Korea about the go back. If, on the different hand, it became N. Korea that initiated the talks, then it should not be referred to as "diplomatic attitude", it may well be referred to as responding to N. Korea's gesture. heritage has taught us that diplomatic potential lower than Clinton, not often worked. heritage has also taught us that diplomatic potential with N.Korea have by no potential worked ! even as are naive liberals going to in ordinary words close their pie holes and listen? possibly they are going to study something !
2016-11-06 03:44:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
actually both Clinton and Bush have made mistakes, not one or the other, both have made deals with North Korea to stop making bombs and NK agrees and then turns around and continues to make them behind our backs, the problem is both presidents basically say we won't tolerate this, basically drawing a line in the sand and NK keeps crossing that line without any repercussions from either president, we keep getting pushed backwards, the real question is do we along with our allies strike as a deterrent or continue this ridiculous game
2006-07-10 06:28:29 · answer #3 · answered by Raw Dog 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why can't Republicans/Conservatives admit that it would have been smarter to go after North Korea, which is a FAR bigger threat because of it's million-man army, than to go after Iraq, which had NOTHING to do with 9/11???
When are you going to ADMIT it?????
2006-07-10 06:10:39 · answer #4 · answered by Truth 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean the US Secretary of State shouldn't dance with despotic and 'ronery' tyrants, either?
Next you're going to tell me that appeasing tyrants has never worked in the history of the world. Well, you probably will, since it is true.
2006-07-10 06:17:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think everything Clinton did was perfect.Still better than Bush by a mile,though.
2006-07-10 06:03:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Excuse me - just who has been in charge in Washington for the past six years? When your party has been controlling the entire government for that long, isn't it about time you stopped blaming the other guys for your problems?
2006-07-10 06:07:49 · answer #7 · answered by e_serafina42 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why do you republicans always whine but don't have your own solutions to these problems?
2006-07-10 06:06:59 · answer #8 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋