2006-07-10 05:55:04 · 7 answers · asked by k h 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Fascinating. When the war began, folks like you were screaming that we were in it for the oil. Well, gee whiz, if that were the case, we could have taken all the oil in Iraq and we'd have plenty to go around, thus REDUCING gas prices.
So now that your original theory has been trashed, you're claiming that Bush did this all along to *increase* gas prices for his buddies in Texas.
You can't have it both ways.
2006-07-10 06:07:21 · answer #1 · answered by Allen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush own es a lot of oil wells and he has driven our country in debt at the rate of"I think I heard" 1.3 billion a day with his little war.That at this point is very BIG. He has to try to recover some from we poor people.He said we can go to alternative fuel.I don't know about the rest of you but as a retired 68 year old I can't afford to go that route.I have to buy his oil or stay home 24/7.
Yes he does have a very close relationship to the rapid soaring gas prices
2006-07-10 13:13:14 · answer #2 · answered by I'm Jerry 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The war was actually called on by the central bankers, aka the Robber Barons of the 1700s and 1800s.
Who are the central bankers? The ten major shareholders of our Federal Reserve. They control the Bank of England (since 1820s). They control the wave of Wall Street. They founded the Federal Reserve, the IRS, the CFR, the UN, WTO, WHO, IMF, and the World Bank.
They gain by indebting nations to them, and thus they incite wars to have both nations in their debt and grasp. They gloated about World War I. They extraordinarily benefitted during the Stock Market crash and the Great Depression. Also, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn & Loeb funded the communist revolution, and J Schroeder funded Hitler ... and never sentenced in the Nuremberg trials.
They undertook to control ALL media outlets since the 1920s ... and did so. They discovered (back then) that in order to control all media, they only had to control the top 25 newspapers, and these would set the example for all the others.
“Give me control over a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws.”
Baron M.A.Rothschild
2006-07-10 13:11:47 · answer #3 · answered by will.pwns 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I Believe it. all those oil companies had never seen such profits ever in history. Just so happens when the current president and all his cronies happened to be on the board fo directors for other oil companies. Bush had an oil company but couldnt find oil and went bankrupt. theres a definate link between the two. Any extreme right winger would deny it of course and start bashing what im saying.
2006-07-10 13:00:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The USA as a whole is the reason for gas price hikes. Bush isn't the only one in office, but I guess everyone needs a scape goat.
Bush pushes the use of ethanol, hybrids, etc. Being dumb Americans, we still buy SUV's, Ford Mustangs, and then complain about gas.
Leave Bush alone in this department, its our own fault we have prices this high.
2006-07-10 13:05:02 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not to mention a close relationship with the bin Laden family.
Remember the BCCI bank failure? Much of the money involved was (a) money funneled by groups related to anti-US terrorism, (b) bin Laden family money, and (c) George Bush's personal wealth.
2006-07-10 13:01:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's hardly a hypothesis. It's a fact.
Please read John Nichols' recent book: The Rise and Rise of Dick Cheney. You'll see how clear this truth is.
2006-07-10 12:59:45 · answer #7 · answered by sochiswim 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋