If you mean "unnatural" to mean "Does not occur in nature", there is lots
of evidence to the contrary.
If you mean "is culturally offensive", perhaps. Activities that slow down
procreation and the spreading of a sect tends to be villified by that sect.
Consider that Catholicism rejects birth control, etc.
It depends on your culture.
If you mean "goes against my religion", it would depend on your religion,
now wouldn't it?
In any case, its "naturalness" is usually not relevent. Even if something
is completely unnatural, it may still be of value. Would you forsake
clothing because it must be processed before it could be worn?
I have yet to see a reasoned, consistant argument that says that
either homosexuality or bi-sexuality is bad that isn't just a derivation
of "its bad because XXX said so".
You could argue that at least homosexuality is GOOD, as it tends
to cut down population growth on a planet that is quickly running
out of resources.
Why is it so important? Why do people care so much? Who does
it hurt?
Can anyone answer this in a way that does not depend on some
religion's doctrine?
2006-07-10 05:34:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Elana 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
How would you know? How would you explains millions of gays and bis? And the many straights who love them? Ask them.
Is religious superstitions unnatural?I think so.
60% of men have had some gay or bi experiences in their lifetime.See the link.
2006-07-10 05:28:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you think it's unnatural, then don't do it. Spend some time taking care of the garden in your own back yard, or see a therapist as to why you have the need to ask this question.
2006-07-10 05:27:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Garth 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's natural, and I don't understand why some people are so uptight about it. Have you ever had a friend who was gay? I somewhat doubt it, although you probably did, but didn't realize it. You may have known some gay people in your life, and they may of been as* holes. But just as there are moronic heterosexuals, there are moronic gays and lesbians. There's too many far more important things to be concerned about during these modern times.
2006-07-10 05:31:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by lemon_sky40 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it isn't. It is said that animals (incluiding human) have homosexuality as a biological response to overpopulation, I mean, that it is a mechanism to reduce the population increasement. Desmond Morris, a zoologist that analizes the human behavior to show how much we are alike to animals, said something like this in an interview.
In the other hand, I think that Freud said something like: homosexuality is the result of an immature sexuality. He said somthing like that(I think)
2006-07-10 05:27:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by let the speakers blow your mind 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, it is wrong and unnatural. I prefer people with higher moral conviction. Gays can be very anti law, promiscious, rebels, ect. and can cause problems for normal people.
plus a guy kissing a guy, gross
2006-07-10 05:32:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by greencaddyman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not necessarily. I think murder and lying is unnatural but no one has hate campaigns against liars.
2006-07-10 05:25:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brandy O 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dont think its unnatural but it can be a little sichening and disturbing at times
2006-07-10 05:26:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Nor do I even agree that you have a right to have an opinion.
2006-07-10 05:27:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Loss Leader 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-07-10 05:25:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by DiRtAlLtHeWaY 4
·
0⤊
0⤋