Why are we not oil-independent if we have Green River in Colorado and the North Slope in Alsaka?

Question

Supposedly we have the largest oil-shale deposits in the world right here in the USA and untold amounts in Alaska. Is this not a National Security issue worth putting aside some petty conservationists demands in order to stop FUNDING the very same groups who are intent on our demise? Imagine the boost to our own economy with huge investments in these areas and the countless jobs and businesses that would spring up at home.

Answer 1

We need to but every time someone mentions developing these areas for oil, the environmentalists go apoplectic with rage. ANWR (the North Slope) was only going to be drilled in the winter (when there are no animals there) and only in an area of about 200 acres but the left-wing, global warming alarmists had a fit anyway. Their argument was in defense of the Caribou that are smart enough to be much further south during the winter! Maybe Caribou are smarter than environmentalists.

In spite of all that, oil from Green River and Alaska are only stop gaps at best. We need to create some new energy sources that are reliable, safe, and cheap. Unfortunately, many on the left are closet Luddites so they reject the very technology that - given a chance - may well provide those future sources of energy.

Answer 2

properly Fred, lemme tell ya. First there's a shortage of production, no longer oil. Makes a large difference. We discovered contained in the 70's that processing shale oil sucks. As a very last hotel in the previous freezing to lack of existence it must be ok, yet there are different places to get oil - like Alaska. And even as gasoline is going to $7.40 5 in accordance to gallon - the present cost in Germany - all regardless of the indisputable fact that the most ardent environmentalists will be screaming for drilling in Alaska. And by employing ardent environmentalist i do no longer propose Al Gore. Now, the rustic of Kuwait would not exist without us. i'm no longer efficient why we do not get heavily discounted oil out of them. we've lost multiple adult men in Iraq so i ought to sense free in the adventure that that they had commence paying us decrease back in oil. obviously when they get a actual democracy they are going to swap on us like a number of human beings else. So extremely than make the mess that shale oil production on the fairway River website can make, allow's purely take over Iraq completely. we've already paid way too intense of a cost for that actual resources to in ordinary words allow it bypass.

Answer 3

Expense is one reason. The technology needed to produce substantive crude from shale is very expensive. Oil companies are doing fine with crude oil production as it is, so why bother right now. A fundamental shift in the view of how to use our natural resources would be needed. Right now, we're more concerned with "global warming" and saving weeds. It's a matter of priorities.

Answer 4

because the slowness of government and the interference of environmental groups has made us a blundering country willing to take the easy route...as soon as we are forced into a corner, we will solve the energy problem and then go on leading the world for the next 150 years, if not forever...

Answer 5

Because america consumes billions of barrels of oil a day. You expect it all to come from two sources?

Answer 6

are you kidding? we can't disturb the caribou!