If Zidane had been in the match the entire time, I believe France would've won. They were attacking more offensively. Ref's have their right to call things as they see them. Once they make a decision, even if they realize afterwards that the call was bad, they can not change they're minds. They have to continue with what they have said. It's a shame. I haven't been this upset in a very long time :(
2006-07-10 02:35:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Modern_Monroe 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
ummmmmmm u want to talk about robbery France's penalty was pure robbery ok there were bad calls on both sides but it's your Zidane that made u all lose because had he been there he would have scored that penalty that the guy missed
2006-07-10 02:39:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, actually, France`s penalty was so not a penalty!!!!
So, I´m glad Italy won... Neither of them deserved it but, in the end, the italians deserved it more than the french...
2006-07-10 02:34:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Carla 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it wasn't a good game, very sloppy soccer, and yes, some of the calls were wrong, ON BOTH SIDES. i see ur a french fan, and thats very respectable. but u lost because ur Zidane couldn't control his temper. he WOULD have kicked in penalties, but they had to put in that rookie guy who hit the crossbar.
2006-07-10 02:33:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Katie C. 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rubbery? You mean robbery?
Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.
I learned that in pre-school.
Forza Italia!
2006-07-10 07:04:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by highroller 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Italy deserved to win, france did not deserve to be there.
It should of been Portugal vs Italy!
2006-07-10 02:34:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by JJ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yea, well your even now, b/c the ref gave u free shot off of your player diveing in the first half, which u scored off of, and took away italy's second goal, when it wasn't offsides
2006-07-10 02:32:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by bahamadude91 5
·
0⤊
0⤋