2006-07-09 23:11:53 · 20 answers · asked by peter p 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
obviously yes
2006-07-09 23:14:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It wasn't the most exciting final I've ever seen, and England's performances weren't the best either... To be honest, I don't think its relavent - you could probably put together the best bits (yes, there were a few!) from the England games to make a game at least as good (there'd be more goals too!) than last night's game. Having said that, it wasn't too bad, especially as I wanted Italy to win. Oh and what was Zidane thinking? It was his last ever match and he does that?!? Stupid! Still, a bit of controversy added some needed spice though.
2006-07-09 23:19:52 · answer #2 · answered by Si C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't understand a few thing about the NBA being in Europe yet i'm very attentive to the NHL doing their annual excursions in the course of the pre-season and it always produces added followers for NHL communities. With MLB I experience it should be a mixed bag with the point to talk - the american previous time meets the British previous time of football (football)? initially i'd anticipate the coolest British to ensue in droves to ascertain the "Yankees" as, properly face it they have arguably between the perfect names in activities - i do not imagine they could anticipate to attain better of an audience than say Manchester United. followers ought to or received't damage out in fights contained in the stands. at the moment there are hockey golf equipment throughout large Britain - i imagine baseball can be a not basic promote because of the cricket followers. i have considered some Cricket Qs in this website in Baseball and they don't look to be pleasant in route of baseball gamers or followers right here. i imagine it truly is an effective concept yet i'd desire that MLB chooses properly. i'm no longer offered on the concept large Britain will take to baseball as say Japan or different Asian and South American international places have. Italy received't take to it besides as say the Netherlands. contained in the accurate, I speculate that the perfect fulfillment will come from Netherlands, Belgium, or maybe the tinier usa of Luxembourg the position everyday George "Blood and Gutts" Patton is buried.
2016-11-30 23:42:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I personaly dont like soccer and I feel it is like watching a chess match very boring. But I feel the penalty kick stuff blows. The game should go into overtime until someone scores first and wins. No time limit on overtime just keep going.
2006-07-09 23:19:27 · answer #4 · answered by Douglas S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course yes. I think the best game England played was against Portugal and that match paled in comparison to the match under reference.
2006-07-09 23:34:04 · answer #5 · answered by genie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definately was...
but the best game was the italy vs germany semi final, that was one of the classics.
I was really disappointed with the italians in the final, they never played like they did in the germany game.
IMO France were very unlucky
2006-07-10 08:52:50 · answer #6 · answered by josohare 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was so boring, the ants on my deck were more fun to watch. No one really won, France just lost. But then again, soccer is such a lame game, that no one wins.
2006-07-09 23:15:27 · answer #7 · answered by thebushman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was a fantastic game and if henry and zidane stayed on france wuld have won but i wanted england 2 win. imagine how ecstatic england would be if they won
2006-07-11 09:51:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
England were terrible bloody Sven.
2006-07-09 23:20:22 · answer #9 · answered by simo9352 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No the final was well boring, the best bit was when Zidane head butted that dude
2006-07-09 23:16:07 · answer #10 · answered by Сеня 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes! i still am intruegued about what happened to Zidane to make him wanna disgrace himself in that way!
but a good match and the best team won!
2006-07-09 23:19:45 · answer #11 · answered by linsy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋