The film was average, but Julianne Moore looked incredible in it...especially near the end.
2006-07-09 23:00:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by geordiekimbo 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I liked the presence of anthony hopkins...he's just....."Hannibal", it's him, and only him...I would have liked though, to have jodie foster back insead of julianne moore (even though she was good in it).....i'll eat her liver with some fava beans, and a nice bottle of chainti
2006-07-10 07:22:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by SpaceCowboy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I liked it. I like the "Hannibal Lecter" charadter. He is very scary. Hopefully Sir Antony Hopkins will reprise his role as "Hannibal Lecter" in a future movie.
2006-07-10 10:42:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by sandiegogal2002@yahoo.com 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
... The movie was wrong ...
very wrong · The movie really sucks .... sorry
I like Sir Anthony, but the director
hasn't made his homework : He never red the trilogy "Hannibal",
and so the best part(s) of the book isn't (aren't) in the film.
Margot the sister of Verger ... or the scene with the hungry people and
young Hannibal ( 1944 ) which explains how
Dr Hannibal became what he is....
please forget the movie and read the books:
"Red Dragon"
"Silence ..."
"HANNIBAL"
... and enjoy ...
2006-07-10 05:48:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Average
2006-07-10 05:33:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by micchi 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
it wasnt like the first one,that was the best, the script, the acting, the scenes, i only watched it because of the actors that were in it.
2006-07-10 22:21:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by hutmamma2004 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it was great I love the gore in it
2006-07-10 05:57:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
good one
2006-07-10 07:08:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by anči 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
bunch of bull
2006-07-10 05:33:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
it was discusting
2006-07-10 05:34:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Leveler 6
·
0⤊
2⤋