No need to send any more troops to Afghanistan or even Iraq.
Local peace keeping organizations are already established. Charge and Authority must be delegated to the respective governments.
Number of troops already posted must also be called off. It's a high time.
But it will not happen as the motive of the war is not yet fulfilled....
Check out the link below to know some hidden truths of war on Afghanistan and Iraq.
2006-07-09 22:24:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Model 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
What did they call it the "commercial protection force complicated" or something. it would favor to be operating in Iraq and thank goodness for those adverse people with the aid of actuality the undesirable individual adult males been performing up over in Afghanistan and back yo can say those adverse people. you comprehend besides as me it extremely is the "mini surge" interior the unique conflict or the purely conflict and the more advantageous the more advantageous ideal. rapidly they received't have the skill back out of Iran or Pakistan and that with any success wil be that. yet did yo extremely imagine of there will be a distinction. ensure out the economics of both activities, similar. Bout the significant ideal distinction now is abortion and guns, loosen up the similar. The deal is of the $4 BILLION that the 35,000 lobbyist provide our good Congress each and each and every 12 months, it extremely is split about EVEN. Have a impressive 2009!
2016-10-14 07:27:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by season 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say we should open a Mcdonalds and Burger King over there and bring the Afgans up to speed with the rest of the world. It would also be a good idea to set up the drive through thing too. Yep confuse the little blighters and they would soon lose interest in shooten at folks.
2006-07-09 22:32:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by mac_mac_uk 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, i served in all of the crap-holes the UK government sent me to. We have stirred a real bees nest in Afghanistan. Its powerful because of the money it has from the heroin trade. The Russians messed up there while the yanks ARMED THE TALIBAN and now we are mopping up the aftermath. Believe me when i say you don't see what is really going on there because the governments keep it quite
2006-07-09 22:28:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
what's wrong with afghanistan deciding its own fate? If the CIA have de-commissioned its 'get Osama' unit then what the hell are britain and america sending troops there for? wasn't the whole idea to stop afghanistan being a breeding groung for terrorism?
2006-07-09 22:17:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by tuthutop 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no what is the point in sending even more people into Afghanistan.there is no point because the Taliban will just hide in the mountains and wait for the right time to attack.so there is no point in more troops.maybe they should use satellites to find the Taliban's and kill them with missile strikes.
2006-07-09 22:20:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Look towards the future! 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. We do not need to send more toops to Afghanistan.
It is true that we should have never been there to begin with, but that point is now moot. We are there and we don't need to see any more men and women die there.
2006-07-09 22:20:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Temple 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mr Bush have tow choices with US army:
Destroy Afganstan
Build Afganstan
I think he is going with Destroying it
2006-07-09 22:15:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by zaaterah 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As long as there are terrorists to kill, we need to send more troops.
2006-07-09 22:20:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by christopher s 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree it is time for Mr Bush to get off the warpath
2006-07-09 22:14:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by crowdog1986 1
·
0⤊
0⤋