i dunno man, but Angels and Demons blows the davincci code out of the water!
2006-07-09 21:32:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by jason 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hi Jimmy boy, sure this is an intelligent question. I agree with Dan Brown, hinting message that religion is a craps.. The Switzerland research centre he mentioned in his book is real, and they actually responsible for the creation of World Wide Web just for the sake of linking their computers together, and decided then to give away to the world for free.
Religion were created thousand of years ago, and the though should have been proved wrong already if not for the elements of faith, which then write off the reason within anyone's brain.
Would you drive a car that is 2000 years old, if not why subscribe to the idea that is so obsoleted?
2006-07-09 21:35:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Titan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally, I agree with Vittoria's father. I believe that science only further explains creation in a more...mechanical way. In other words, science and physics are the hands of God, if you will. I am all for the fusion of religion and science. I love science, and I have great faith in my religion. Science has a more thorough explaination, but it also has many explanations while religion, Christianity in particular, has one explanation although it is a somewhat vague one. So personally I believe a fusion between the two to be the best explanation.
2006-07-10 16:17:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by secrets_in_mind3 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great book, just finished it!
Im a science guy, and I thought that the Camerlengo gave a great few speeches about how Science is not the end all and be all of the great debate.
What I got is this: Science now trumps religion when it comes to giving the best explanations of everything, but religion is necessisary to provide the moralistic point of view, so that science does not get "carried away" in essence. make sense?
2006-07-09 21:35:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by darbyrob43 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think both explanations are as out there as each other its up to you to choose which you believe more personally i go with science all the way at least theres proof to some of it where as religions a story book and not a very good one either
2006-07-09 21:36:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by michelleramtulla 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science is not proven true until there is proof. Visable, tangable proof, therefore all ideas on how the world was created is theory because no one was there to see it. There are hundreds of theories. Religion requires faith. And although many people will contradict me on this, every day science is providing, and making finds that support the Bible. Me personally, I believe in Creation..not some theory.
2006-07-10 05:23:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by AutumnDays 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science explains what religion teaches. Oftentimes, people misconstrue that these two aspects are incoherent because they could not relate each other. These two are just misinterpreted by others making misconceptions and wrong conclusions. The creation of world originated from something that was greated by GOD. There is an ultimate cause for everything and it is God.
2006-07-09 21:36:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
do not attempt to seek his historic accuracies as his books are books of fiction. case in factor the useless Sea Scrolls do not have something with regards to, Jesus, Mary Magdalene, Christianity etc. The Jesuits had not something to do with the dissolution of the Knights Templar. The Knights Templar were dissolved interior the early 1300s. The Jesuit order become depending interior the 1500s. Opus Dei is a company that is controversial between some Catholics as they sense it demands a pressure in its individuals. because of that the employer will grow to be a objective for writers of sensationalism.
2016-10-14 07:27:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by season 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither . Yoga , which is an art and a discipline rather than a set of tenets or beliefs, got the day saved, such that the lady could escape from her bonds, and seduce the hero guy at the end.
2006-07-09 21:50:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by DinDjinn 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that science has the better explanation to the creation of the universe and that "Angels & Deamons" explained it well.
2006-07-09 21:38:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither religion nor science has a good explanation for it. coz the only religion people write about is the christian religion and well with half of their bible still unfound i don't think we can really turn to the for answers. and science, well lets just say scientist never think outside the box...
2006-07-09 21:34:54
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋