Is it just me or did the twin towers fall wrong?

Question

From everything that I've heard and seen regarding their collapse looks too controlled. I've seen numerous documenteries and such that show the construction of the towers and their collapse. The top should have fallen off like when you cut the top of a tree off, only much different since it's a building, not a tree. The bottom part would still get crushed but the top wouldnt fall straight down like that.

Steel keeps it's structural integrity at up to 2500 degrees and the buildings main steel support was a column of posts in the center surrounding the elevator shafts. The fire may have burned hot enough to melt the posts and cause a collapse, but not a perfect straight down one like that, the odds of it going like that once are phenomenal, let alone twice which is what were expected to believe.

This may sound cold but I wish all of you were in those towers when they went down, then maybe you'd believe the explosions that brought it down instead of blatantly ignoring the facts and calling me a loony. I suggest that you all go back the the inquisition or the salam witch trials because that's where you're narrow minds belong.

Answer 1

My husband and I were on vacation with my brother and his wife-both of whom are firemen-on 9/11 and we sat and watched the events unfold on tv that day. The whole time all of this was happening, my brother and his wife were telling us-in great detail-what the fire men inside the building were doing, they were explaining the equipment each fireman was hauling up the stairs, etc. About an hour after the second plane hit, I asked my brother if the buildings would stand and he said it was just a matter of time. He explained how hot jet fuel burns and the amount of fuel that the plane was carrying, and that even the steel used in those buildings was not able to withstand that kind of heat for that length of time without losing it's integrity. He added that there was no way to extinguish the fires, and even if they could douse the flames. the damage was done. He explained to us that the building was likely designed-because of it's height-to collapse like an accordion. And it did. So to me, all the conspiracy theories are a bunch of bull. There was no controlled demolition and the only conspiracy was a bunch of muslim extremist terrorists conspiring to kill and terrorize Americans.

So please loosen your tin foil hat, I think it may be on a bit too tight.

Answer 2

Actually, the way they fell makes perfect sense. The mid-level floors burned out and their supports collapsed resulting in the huge weight of the upper floors crashing down upon the lower floors. Like hitting a nail with a hammer, the force goes straight down. You've been viewing propaganda films put out there by French agents in Canada who seek to undermine the U. S. in the mid-east so that they can have that marketplace. France and Germany were complicit in getting rich off the UN embargos against Iraq by black-marketing supplies in to Saddam. They really hate the U. S. for ruining their money machine. Also Saddam owned many European media outlets and still had/has sympathizers among them.
I honestly don't see how the shrieking libtards can, out of one side of their mouths say how stupid they think President Bush is, and then out of the other side say how he pulled off this huge conspiracy. And some people would rather climb a tree to believe a lie that stand on the ground and accept the truth.

Answer 3

The Twin Towers didn't fall wrong, millions of people saw the towers sadly fall and they didn't fall wrong. Now on your theory of the fire not have burned hot enough for the structural support to collapse upon itself almost perfectly. The fire alone wasn't hot enough, however, when the gasoline from the jet liner combined with the original fire. It became hot enough for the steel alloy to melt and when the tremendous weight came upon the remaining levels, it collapsed. And in almost 'perfect' fashion, the tower fell upon itself and the weight increased as it collapsed upon each floor.

Answer 4

Actually, the towers fell exactly as they were designed to do when they would have reached the end of their expected life. At that time, explosive charges would have been placed to take out critical supports and the buildings would "pancake" exactly as they did. And, as for the heat factor, the power of 50,000 gallons of burning jet fuel inside the enclosed area of the towers was more than sufficient to melt the smaller steel supports, which eventually led to the failure of the larger ones.

Answer 5

Air pressure. The falling top created a high level of air pressure that led the way down. It's the same principle that caused the New Orleans Causeway to be destroyed during Katrina. Water rose up and trapped air under the sections. Each square foot of air trapped causes ungodly amounts of pressure to build. Now imagine that much concrete and steel falling at a high rate of speed.

Answer 6

Most of the jet fuel burnt up VERY quickly, it did not have time to 'cook' the beams....3 buildings collapsed not 2 and the 3rd one was never hit!? Lot of eye witnesses heard the demo charges go off!

Answer 7

comparable element surpassed off in Oklahoma city whilst the Murrah development grow to be attacked. I observed the uncooked photos of the rescuers gaining wisdom of bombs planted interior the development. This grow to be stay television--they made the rescuers flow away the development so as that they might not get blown up. as quickly because of the fact the ATF got rid of the bombs, it grow to be as though they on no account existed. by way of the ten:00 information, all of us denied what they observed and heard that day approximately the different explosive units. So i've got faith you. did you comprehend the international commerce bombers have been experienced on the college of Oklahoma flight college, and that OU president David Boren basically surpassed off to be in Washington on September eleven, 2001 basically hours till now and by using the attack? nutrients for concept....

Answer 8

i don't mean this to be offensive but are you a construction expert? i'm not and i've seen the accusations that explosives were set up but i've never heard this before. leaving my theories out of this i'd like to hear more, if you're saying this based on what you know.

Answer 9

Get yourself a DVD called "In Plane Sight" I think that will answer all your questions or check oput the web site inplanesight.com. The DVD is best though

Answer 10

yeah it was huge conspiracy man. they were hit by planes dumbass. the floors actully fell onto each other. causing the weight to be too much for the other floors.