gary glitter getting court looking at underage pornsites, or the police highlighting the sites? Is there less people now looking for those sites? GARY GLITTER IS ONE PERSON HE IS BAD????
2006-07-09 19:15:13 · 12 answers · asked by dankankirstchar@btopenworld.com 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
ITS NOTHING TO DO WITH DIRTY GARY. dont mention his name in answer.... Police have advertised porn on web. POINT is........... If it was "nobody" advertising would be nil. Police
2006-07-09 19:45:08 · update #1
THE QUESTION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GARY IT COULD BE ANY FAMOUS PERSON. ITS ABOUT POLICE ADVERTISING PORN
2006-07-09 19:53:53 · update #2
ok as a father... anyone who does anything to underage girls or boys for that matter deserved to be hanged by the neck until they are dead... it's not the police it's the dirty bastards who put it on the internet and the media for highlighting it...ok? better? no mention og GG here was there..opps sorry then to top it all the sleaze bag scum paid them off to stop himslef getting a proper sentence as they have no money there... justice? don't think so... I hope he gets his **** reamed out in the prison over there with a ruddy great pineapple
2006-07-09 19:18:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think I understand your question now that you have rephrased it a little. I believe there will always be a certain portion of the population that will be pedophiles. Granted a fairly small portion but nonetheless a certain portion.
I don't believe the police highlighting those does anything but bring a little light to the anonymity that pervades these sites and the people that peruse them. I have said for a long time that the internet is too impersonal.
The Yahoo Boards are the perfect example. People say the most horrid things in this forum. These people would not dare walk up to people on the street and say these things. But in an anonymous forum they are emboldened to say what they want however they want.A simple requirement that you identify yourself on each site would stop most of this nonsense.
Severe penalties could be put in place for violating this policy. This would have the effect of showing everyone who the criminals are and would, at the very least, force them back underground. It would also disallow them the right of open assembly which would be a very good situation.
2006-07-09 19:22:22 · answer #2 · answered by rhutson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you will find that Gary Glitter was actually in court because he had sexual relations with underage girls. That is against the law, whatever anyone says about it.
The police don't highlight these sites, they are concentrating on trying to catch the people who set them up and cause damage to innocent children. Someone has got to try and help these poor kids... if the MEDIA attention highlights these sites it is not the fault of the police.
2006-07-09 19:29:23 · answer #3 · answered by dashabout 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont think the media or the police advertise these sites they are trying their best to police them effectivelly - gary glitter should be brought back to england and put in jail for life without any parole or release. leaving him in these poor countries with incompetent justice systems and bribery ignored would only encourage him to reoffend.
ALL paedos should be put to death but here in england we have do gooders who would cry murder. maybe they wouldnt be so soft if it was their children that had been abused.
2006-07-10 00:38:36 · answer #4 · answered by tra 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'd say that I answer questions from my contacts as rapidly as achievable, depending upon the question. many times, by using the time i'm getting to them, a best answer has already been chosen. like you, my expensive, I have a constrained era of time i visit spend the following on a daily basis. For questions of actuality, I many times do not answer if someone has already replied properly. For questions of opinion, I also peruse the solutions to work out if people say what I intend to assert. ultimately, if the question remains open and pastimes me, i will answer no count how old. Auntie Kookoo
2016-10-14 07:23:44 · answer #5 · answered by cottrell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is a bad man and the police should not be publicising these porn sites there should be some protection for these young girls.
2006-07-10 11:16:16 · answer #6 · answered by butterfly55freedom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is a disgusting excuse for a man but no doubt when or if he comes back to England you will get some crank trying to help him because they will think they can save him from himself, that he is`nt really a bad person, when we all know he is.
2006-07-09 19:46:37 · answer #7 · answered by madge 51 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he was shown up for doing wrong I hope other people see it as wrong. I would agree in some cases it seems the news is almost promoting wrong doing putting ideas in peoples heads
2006-07-09 19:34:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you. Why on earth advertise the web site????? How careless.
2006-07-09 23:48:33 · answer #9 · answered by MissBehave 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bad man - a "nouce"
2006-07-09 19:29:48 · answer #10 · answered by brian 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋