Why do you think the U.S. would fly their own planes into a couple of towers?

Question

I think so they would have reason to rape the middle east of their oil, But there has to be more to the story. Any idea's? And I dont want a bunch of idiots saying I'm retarded and wrong, Just grown-ups answer this one please.

Answer 1

To give reason to "go to war" so they can control the oil fields.

How do you think the American public would of reacted if Bush got on TV and said I am going to take us to war just to protect our oil so we can continue to live like we do.

We would of laughed him out of office. So they had to figure out another way.

Plus its part of a grander plan by secret societies for world dominance. These secret societies want a "one world nation" a one world order. If you look over time it has all been part of a larger plan.

Make us all so scared about terrorism, that we are not safe anywhere. Now introduce a New World Government to control this problem and to cure wars among nations. They will use the excuse that if we are under the same Government there will be no need for fighting, guns, military, etc and they will take control of us all.

No different then what Hilter tried but on a global scale this time. It is why many main governments turn a blind eye to the killings in Africa. The top leaders are all part of these secret societies and they see what is happening in Africa, Iraq and other places as "cleaning the earth of the waste". Just like Hitler was doing to the Jews. He only killed 5 million....so far they estimate over 12 million are dead due to todays "cleaning" yet the world stays blind.

Answer 2

If it was all "to rape the middle east of their oil", then why are we paying more than $3 a gallon at the gas pump? You don't make sense. It would be heartless to say this, but to some Americans, it wouldn't be a bad idea to simply take that oil to save on gas. And by the way, the way you think makes you not only an idiot, but a wrong retard too. Crawl back inside your cave, Osama!

Answer 3

I don't believe this is what happened, I think this is more or less a crackpot conspiracy theory with no good evidence backing it up.

BUT assuming it DID happen that way, one obvious reason would be to garner political support for a planned war against Iraq. A secondary reason would be to unify the nation after a divisive impeachment in the late 90s and an extremely bitter election in 2000. If you need a scapegoat for your problems and an excuse to start your war (whatever the reasons for this war might be) then you need an event to point to and get attention for it. For Hitler it was the Reichstag Fire. For America ASSUMING THIS WERE THE CASE, it would be the WTC/Pentagon attacks on September 11th, 2001.

Oh and to the nimrod saying China uses more oil than America, this is factually incorrect. The war still wasn't aboit oil, you were right about that, but check your facts before you make a total tool out of yourself
http://www.nationmaster.com/red/pie/ene_oil_con-energy-oil-consumption

Answer 4

OMG...Hasn't this question been beaten into the ground like a million times. You conspiracy theorists just can't get over it, no matter how much evidence we prove, you hate George Bush and there isn't enough evidence in the world to convince you that this didn't happen. Seriously, "Raping the Middle East"? That's a tad extreme don't you think? Liberalism is a mental disorder.. and by saying this "And I dont want a bunch of idiots saying I'm retarded and wrong" just goes to show that you really do know deep down that you ARE retarded and wrong.

Answer 5

Though I am still of the opinion that the 9/11 acts of terrorism were not committed by American government sources, there is one troubling fact I have a hard time ignoring. Early in 2001, around the time of Bush's inauguration, some member of his administration made a public statement to the effect that Americans would only support the Bush doctrine (the idea that first strike, including nuclear first strike, was a legitimate option for the U.S.) if there were a catastrophic attack on U.S. soil. Lo and behold, later that year there was! Afghanistan and Iraq have already felt that "first strike" policy in action. A convenient act of terrorism to say the least.

Answer 6

They would not, however they would suppress information about imminent attacks if it gave them justification to do something they otherwise could not do, say invade a foreign country uninvolved in said attacks. If the road to a goal is in another direction just change the direction of the sign. I believe you are correct about the oil but we must also look at who bankrolled the current administration, Saudis. When the presidents father is holding hands with the Saudi Royal family and the Bin Laden's were major contributors to his election campaign one must wonder where policy is made. It does not help matters that the presidency rested on the state governed by the candidates brother and a supreme court appointed by his father. "The World According To Bush" is a documentary that aired in Canada that sheds light on your question.

Answer 7

Gosh there is a plethora of reasons.

Creating a war is always good for the country and the economy.

This is an insidious one, to subtly take away our freedoms for the sake of safety, when we give up our freedoms, we can be controlled.

Another one is, many short traders and large institutions, more then usual placed their shorts in the stock market , they knew the market would crash and when it did they made millions and millions. How did they know the market would crash? The govt. refused to investigate this and subpoena these institutions records to find out who these people were? why?

Keep in mind, I am not saying this govt. orders plane into a couple of towers, but people in this govt did know that 9/11 would happen and where was the CIA and our intelligence agencies? Why wasn't it thwarted?

Answer 8

this is a pretend analogy. Afghanistan is little better than a Stone Age usa, and it had a authorities which actual inspired Islamic radicals. there have been factions, in spite of the indisputable fact that, that were anti-Taliban and which welcomed the U. S. intervention. we are the most technologically stepped ahead usa contained in the international, and our authorities may likely no longer in any respect encourage Argentine radicals if there have been any to attack yet another usa. If that occurred and we had the chief hiding right here we may in all probability help the chinese locate him (or her) and convey that individual to justice. i'm positive after ten years of chinese occupation of the U. S. the occupiers may in all probability pick to stay right here instead of returning living house. see you later as they presented a great number of chinese foodstuff and chopsticks i'd likely be very pleasant with them, socially a minimum of.

Answer 9

They didn't. And, by the way, you people saying that this is all about oil and so on. Are you aware that China uses the most oil in the world? For every one American using oil there are 5 in China. Stop blaming Bush!

Answer 10

There is absolutely no reason for the U S to do this. NONE. I would never ascribe noble motives to our governments decisions. But, in this case, there is no doubt we were victimized. Why do you 'conspiracy theorists' (there must be more to the story) always seek some convoluted explanation for a straightforward attack. (I'll bet you think Lee Harvey Oswald was a ghost shooter and the kill shot came from the grassy knoll.)