Is Suri Cruise fictional? Why haven't we seen pictures?

Question

And another thing, has Tom Cruise alienated all of his fans? I used to enjoy his movies. Now I can't stand to hear his voice.

Answer 1

First off, yes, Tom Cruise has become a joke, an offensive joke, everything he says and does is outlandish. I liked him in Vanilla Sky and one other movie. I don't even want to see him again; his interviews with Oprah and Larry King have been almost insane. He has ruined whatever appeal he ever had as an actor, becoming aggressive about somehow proving his superiority every time he opens his mouth in public.

Now as to the out of wedlock baby: I saw a news article today which was pretty disgusting. They were offered $3 million for the pictures and it wasn't enough. Jolie and Pitt got $4 million for their baby pictures. So Cruise took the photos off the market.

The whole thing is just unbelievably out of control. What was it, a big auction competition between the two unmarried couples? the article if you want to read it is as follows:

Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes refused to sell pictures of their new daughter, Suri, after the photos were offered to the media and failed to get a significant price, according to media reports.

Photos of other newborn celebrity babies, including Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's baby Shiloh, Gwen Stefani's baby Kingston and Brooke Shields' baby Grier have all graced the covers of major magazines.

According to Fox News correspondent Roger Friedman, a photo shoot of Suri was offered to photo agency Wire Image, who also brokered the picture of Pitt and Jolie's baby, right after the baby was born in April.

Photos of Shiloh Jolie-Pitt were reportedly sold to People magazine for $4 million, but pictures of Suri Cruise produced not more than a $3 million bid.

At that point the offer for the photos was reportedly rescinded.

A magazine expert tells Friedman now that the baby is nearly three months old, her price will only go down, adding, "Shiloh was the whole deal. We won't see a baby like that again for a while."
-------
By the way, if and when either of these couples marries, I give them both about 3 years before the divorce. I predicted 2 years for McCartney and the gold digger, but it lasted 4 years due to their having a child at one last ditch attempt to create a family.
Any real marriages still left in Hollywood? Any at all?

Answer 2

She is either fictional or there is something very wrong with her. I mean, imagine what a blow that would be to a huge ego like Tom Cruise's. First, he makes a huge deal about having a baby & then suddenly it's all hush in TomKatLand. Not that I would make fun of anyone for having a child with health problems or a deformity, but maybe that's more than Tom could handle...that's IF the baby was real to begin with.

And now this: the birth certificate was signed almost a month late (which is not usually allowed) by someone who wasn't at the birth (and maybe has never seen Suri) - so that TomKat can get Suri a passport (to leave the country). Fishy, fishy, fishy! http://www.tmz.com/2006/07/10/exclusive-suri-cruise-birth-certificate

Answer 3

Sounds exactly like something I read in Star magazine. I'm not trying to defend tom cruise, maybe he has a few strong, controversial opinions, but whatever, that's his deal. Maybe, he just decided to keep his new baby daughter away from the media and the prying, critical eyes of society. I'm not saying that that's the way everyone should go, but give the guy a break, and if you don't want to see his movies, fine, don't watch them. Not a katie holmes fan either, but just because she went shoe shopping at nine months, does not mean she faked a pregnancy.

Answer 4

Tom Cruise is probably just opting to have some privacy for the baby. It took him three years to reveal his adopted children. Tom Cruise, although in recent accounts, is usually very private about his family. I still think he's a little crazy though.

Answer 5

The media is jsut attempting to discover something to gossip about. as a lot as i imagine Tom and Katie get on my nerves I nonetheless think of their privateness desires to be respected. I also examine that the church of scientology believes in silent births the position they don't desire the toddler to hearken to at least something even as they arrive into the international that would taint them or wreck them for existence-so i do not understand how lengthy this idea lasts yet perhaps they're nonetheless not taking pictures at this factor...that is in simple terms my hypothesis.

Answer 6

I think she is real, but perhaps has a birth defect of some kind. Then again she could be perfectly normal for a newborn. Keep in mind that when Tom & Nicole adopted there were no pictures of THAT child for THREE YEARS!!!!!

Answer 7

It would be one thing to keep the media away, but it sounds like close friends and family also haven't seen the baby.

Cruise is as kooky as Michael Jackson and I think the marriage is a sham too, just like all of MJ's.

Answer 8

I highly doubt it. Some people jis like some privacy. I respect Tom and Katie for wnating that. Would you wnat paparazzi all over ur baby?

Answer 9

cause Tom Cruise is an idiot,sexist pig,egomaniac and thats just the answer,i hate tom,but ya,he doesnt want overexposure,if thats how ya spell it

Answer 10

She's real. She's probablly the most ugliest baby in the world.