Nothing can exist without first bodies. A first body is an invariant that can neither be created nor be destroyed. A thing that has only one first body is an invariant that can never vary. A thing that has more than one first body can vary. Variant is the order of the first bodies of things having more than one first body. A variant cannot be defined, analyzed, and understood without its distinct invariant first bodies.
First bodies = first principles, first ideas, elements, fundamentals
Order = structure, form, state, arrangement
2006-07-09 16:40:54 · 7 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
I'd just like to say that I am VERY impressed with this observation, but sadly I don't feel qualified to give you a solid answer.
The only issue I can see, comes from Hawking Radiation. Quantum mechanics tells us that energy isn't always conserved necessarily, just on average, and that pairs of virtual particles are continuously being created and destroyed.
Both aren't destroyed in Hawking radiation though. One falls into a black hole and one escapes. In that case, the one that escaped would exist as a first body in the sense you seemed to be talking about, but was created.
That doesn't solidly dismiss your observation though. These particles came from energy, and if energy can be described in terms of first bodies, then maybe all those statements do hold. The answer to that question, however, is beyond my grasp.
Sorry.
To the chaos theorist, that is a mathematical construct that can be used to describe the real world, but need not hold in its minute details. No matter how you cut it, we can only say for sure that it is something that lives in the mathiverse, not the universe.
2006-07-09 16:48:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No Chaos Theory denies things from only happening this way. It may occur that way or it may come about randomly in some other way. In a Platonic Ideal world your theory would work. But that is not the real world.
In our Quantum Universe some things seem to occur because they are observed. Thus the observer may in fact be the first causitive factor.
2006-07-09 23:44:07 · answer #2 · answered by alyxsylvr 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Existence is defined as having mass and volume. nothing else is required. and yes nothing does not exist ,unless of course there really is nothing there. but that is making something of nothing and that is a religeous question cause only the Lord God can make something of nothing and have it continue to exist..
2006-07-09 23:50:44 · answer #3 · answered by mr.phattphatt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If no one can understand your statement can it be compared to the laws of science?
2006-07-09 23:50:25 · answer #4 · answered by Steve 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If your talking about a Mold
2006-07-09 23:43:41 · answer #5 · answered by abramelin_the_wise_mage 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think yes..
your question itself contains the answer
2006-07-09 23:46:20 · answer #6 · answered by illias k 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
is this a question or a statement?
2006-07-09 23:44:55 · answer #7 · answered by Bob S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋