Since the mass of a proton & electron are known, their common center of gravity can be calculated. They each rotate about this point which is close to but not quite on the center of the proton.
2006-07-09 16:36:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Steve 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. And there are several reasons why.
1. The proton is about 3,000 times more massive than each electron.
2. Electrons don't "revolve" around the proton. They are not like planets around a sun. The electron is like a standing wave function that is distributed over a much wider volume than the protron is. This is necessary to involve the atom in chemical bonding.
3. Except for the hydrogen atom all atoms have more than one electron and proton. There is no equivalent binding energy for electrons like there is for protrons that would hold them together in the nucleus of an atom. The protrons have a special particle called a "gluon" that binds them together, otherwise their mutual positive charges would cause them to fly apart.
Interesting question though. Shows you are thinking.
2006-07-09 16:42:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The proton and netron are in the nucleus of the atom. Electrons are (usually) outside of the nucleus. They do not orbit around the nucleus like planets, however. There is what is called an "electron cloud", which sounds like lots of electrons buzzing around like a swarm of bees, but it only takes one electron to make the cloud. The cloud is simply an area where the electron is likely to be present. It is in fact *everywhere* in the cloud at once until you actually try to measure its position. Then it is in one place. This quantum behavior is explained by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
2006-07-09 16:37:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dr. Rob 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Protons and neutrons reside in the nucleus of an atom. The electrons reside outside the nucleus and revolve around that.
2006-07-09 16:31:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by flyercam2 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. The proton is in the nucleus of the atom. The neutron is in the nucleus too. The electron orbits the nucleus
2006-07-09 16:31:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neela's answer is sweet, in case you imagine of the electron as a particle. Theoretically the moon can keep on revolving around the Earth continually without lack of skill, as envisioned by technique of the regulation of conservation of angular momentum. there is a few skill loss, in spite of the indisputable fact that, because of tidal friction. yet it truly isn't any longer an similar ingredient as a wide fraction of the moon's skill leaving each and every revolution. in addition, the electron can keep going round. see you later because it became given the right p.c. initially, it keeps its p.c. continually with out any better skill enter. regrettably, the electron-as-particle sort fails on many counts, in spite of the indisputable fact that. a better physically powerful one treats the electron as a standing wave. Bohr pictured the electron wave going round an orbit and interfering with itself truly. That sort became too ordinary, and failed too. nevertheless, the only in use by technique of physicists is composed of the electron being a wave that dissipates no skill.
2016-11-30 23:12:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no simple answer to this question. I've made a hobby of studying quantum physics and cosmology and all that rubbish that they make up when they try to explain what happens when they do huge experiments with lots of energy in tiny places and tiny amounts of time (or the other way around)
At one point I read somewhere that basically it depends on what your point of view is. (don't ask me where, theres just too many really big books to look through) yea i'm surprised there's an actual answer to this too, you're not alone ha ha
2006-07-09 16:34:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by tyrebrnr21 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Revolve?! How quaint. You're a century out of step if you believe in the Bohr model of the atom.
2006-07-09 18:19:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by mathematician 2
·
0⤊
0⤋