Clocks that are made in the Far East have that marking.
They don't use Roman numerals enttirely the way we do.
It's also cheaper for them to produce the numbers.
But either way is actually accepted.
2006-07-09 15:40:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by J.D. 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
When you write the 12 (Roman) numbers on a clock, the lower part can come upside down. Most people think IV upside down as 6 in stead of 4. That is why they really use IIII.
2006-07-10 01:42:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Thermo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've seen it both ways. I always thought that IIII was done because it looked more "fashionable" to the design of the clock.
Either that, or the designers just don't remember how Roman numerals should be written.
2006-07-09 23:12:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by gallostravels 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have never seen it written as IIII on any clock. I have always seen it as IV. Maybe it's just a mistake.
2006-07-09 22:40:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Should be, I've always seen it as IV.....never seen it as IIII
2006-07-09 22:41:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A very good question.
Cecil Adams covered this in his column, "The Straight Dope" (reference 1).
There are several theories, but that historically this is the "way it's always been done" is the most likely.
2006-07-09 22:45:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the number 12 is written as IIIIIIIIIIII.
2006-07-09 23:55:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have never seen that, it should be IV. That is too wierd.
2006-07-09 22:40:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Gwen 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
YOU HAVE A DEMENTED CLOCK!!!!!!! does it actually keep time
2006-07-09 22:42:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You had it made in India didn't you?
2006-07-09 23:13:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋