English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

Corporate America

2006-07-09 13:50:36 · answer #1 · answered by tattiehoker54 3 · 2 0

~~~~~ #a million what proportion billions (sure, with a B) have the congress mandated to this "conflict in defiance of the U. S. shape" - and can this defiance be based on the incontrovertible fact that congress might desire to declare conflict? the quantity of funds presented thorugh congress might desire to supply us a demonstration of what they actually think of roughly this "unlawful" conflict. keep on with the money path. i like #2 the appropriate. a little one-kisser that lies to the human beings of the U. S., to Congress, and TO THE U.N. - can't believe that any baby-kisser has ever executed that for any reason. #3 How do you tell a ineffective terrorist from a ineffective civilian. How does any commander-in-chief accomplish this restrict for the period of conflict? undergo in innovations carpet bombing, Hiroshima and Nagasaki - democrat presidents that have been worth of admire and not impeachment. #4 Spying is authorized against suspected criminals - He merits to be impeached if he does not try this. #5 This grew to become into no longer of project. It grew to become into executed and no, you are not getting a do-over .... Saddam is ineffective. #18 non-criminal is thought? permit's attempt the terrorists whilst they blow themselves up? #20 the administrative can reject or settle for treaties at their will as they are equivalent to the legislative. The legality of the conflict of words between the branches may be taken to the splendid court. a) ***** to the final public party interior the senate and congess. They have been supposedly voted in to end the conflict and doubtless impeach Bush. b) the final public party in congress is complicit in helping all strikes by employing president Bush in Iraq at the instant - ***** to them. c) Now, evaluate heavily why a and b are genuine. word that the final public party of congress did no longer permit President Clinton escape with mendacity to the yankee human beings - properly, easily mendacity decrease than oath it quite is customary as perjury.

2016-12-10 07:06:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Looking their animals?? Do you mean if owners look like their animals?
Looking their animals:
George W.: first pile of sh?t made by dog 1.
Cheney: second pile of sh?t made by dog 2.
Look like their animals:
George W.: I would not insult any animal.
Cheney: George W. look alike.

2006-07-09 14:32:54 · answer #3 · answered by Dottie 6 · 0 0

I'm not George W. Bush and I'm not Dick Cheney.

2006-07-09 14:12:09 · answer #4 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 0 0

ray the rattlesnake owns them both

2006-07-09 13:50:31 · answer #5 · answered by Kiss my Putt! 7 · 0 0

A chimp and a weasel.

2006-07-09 13:49:45 · answer #6 · answered by spackler 6 · 0 0

a couple of disfigured baboons

2006-07-09 13:51:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the public...

2006-07-09 13:53:18 · answer #8 · answered by spdrcr124 3 · 0 0

HAHAHHAHAHAHAH, you`re not funny.

2006-07-09 13:49:29 · answer #9 · answered by sunnnyy 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers