Would their be abortion if women ran the world and Justice system?

Question

Is it the permiscuity of men that has made abortion nessasary in many peoples minds? If par say men were kept to the same level of chasity as women in the past, dose it effect now? Would abortion be nessasary if women kept to their guns no matter how men tried to entice them into sexula intercorse?
If men truly kept themselves chase would things be better?

People I am not asking for the histroy of the world. I am just asking bluntly what you think about the queastin in general. Women rulling the world and all, keep to the quesatin and plase no more tangents about the immoratly of the human animal.

Let me reiterate since everyone seems to miss the questain entierly, this is not about wither or not Abortion is nessary, if woemn did not want to get pregnate then sex is not an option easy and genetic abnormalties are a reisk one takes. I want to know yes or not would it be nessasary considering eth divition in women today. Thoses for an agasnt it, would it still be if WOMEN RULEd and not men. Sex is sex and I don't care. Think about this, how big is the divition in women for it an women against it? Then put it alltogether and give me you opion don't get up on either band wagon cues i don't care. Abortion is wrong in my book so stating that stuff is pointless now you can answer the questain or not answer at all!

Answer 1

That depends on if material dependence and social structure is still more important than children. It is the cause of abortion after all.

Our society doesn't want the immorality of abortion but it also doesn't want the responsibility of caring for each and every child. Privilege of morals without the cost and responsibility it takes to maintain them.

That is the measure that determines this issue.

Answer 2

Why are you assuming that women were chaste in the past? The evidence that I'm aware of says that whilst there was social pressure on women to be so ( mostly so men had at least illusory control, over their genetic legacy--ie. so thet they were assured thus woman's baby would ACTUALLy be theirs)--that women , especially once married, always have enjoyed an appetite for sex. And they also got pregnant , frequently, in "awkward", or downright lifethreatening, times and circumstances.Mortality rates, in say, pre WW England, for mothers and children, were horrendous.Backyard abortions were rife, incredibly risky, and a measure of just how desperate some of these women (often married, and pregnant to their husbands) had become.
Abortion is "necessary", partly because the culture does not adequately support or value chidrearers(usually women) to do their job.It is underpaid, undervalued, and often carried out with minimal support, or none at all. It is 24/7, 7 days a week, and god forbid you should be outside of a traditional relationship, or recieving ANY welfare, or you get labelled as immoral, and a bludger, even to this day--even though welfare does NOT , cannot, any where near adequately support a woman to do the job properly.At least the medical care (in the West!) is reasonably adequate.
So in answer to your question--strangely, yes, i think there would. Though I would think that social policy would change significantly, (PERHAPS!) to the benefit of women having children, and women in general, so you might expect to see a reduction in abortion, I don't think that many women who had read their history, or gone though poverty with children, or rape, would ever abolish , or try to block, access to safe abortion.


And PS--I did answer the question. If women "ruled the world", I presuming they were adults with wide range of experiences, I do not think abortion would be deemed by the majority to be "unnecessary", and certainly not made a criminal offence. For the reasons given above. And whilst I think it's cute that you think it's that simple ("If a woman did not want to get pregnant , then sex is not an option") , I also think that it's an incredibly simplistic and naive approach. What about rape?What about pressure brought to bear on teens with very low self esteem, by boys who know it, and never have to live with the consequences. What about women who for various reasons, including sexual abuse, do not have the self esteem to even begin to consider that they're body is sacred, and their own?Abortion has always been-- in tribal cultures, as well as our own--it is only a matter of levels of safety. If it is abolished, the necessary secrecy, and the adventage taken by less than scrupulous ppl,will once again make it a serious health risk.But it won't stop women having them.You "theory" is brutal, when ALL the consequences, and responsibiliy to control and refrain, falls at women's feet.

Answer 3

Women love sex just as men do. It is a silly game when men are supposed to get women to have sex and women are supposed to fight them off. A woman wants commitment from a man as she has more to lose because of the makeup of our society and because she can get pregnant and then she is condemned while the man is admired. It is the fact that there is no perfect birth control method and the fact that there are fetuses that would develop into children with terrible genetic diseases like Tay-sachs and Downs syndrome that there is a need for abortion. Married people have abortions too. Sometimes it is the health of the woman, sometimes it is the state of the fetus and sometimes it's that they just don't want any more children.

Answer 4

Of course there would still be abortions. Being promiscuous does not mean that a woman wants to get pregnant. Unless you are talking about an Amazon Tribe like society, your question is very unlikely to occur.

Men have the rights now and I think that is what you might like to address. Think about this, a woman is frowned upon for purchasing birth control, a reasonable and responsible approach to maintaining a level of impregnation. A man on the other hand is encouraged to find chemical virility aids.

When a woman reaches menopause, she is expected to grin and bear it. A man of similar age and ability is ushered into a men's club for seniors with little blue pills and "fun, fun, fun".

Answer 5

sounds to me that in your mind abortion is allowed because man wants it too. i believe if more women ran the world abortion clinics would be open 24hrs a day and probably located inside of wal-marts and other places.men are not the only ones who think about and want sex. i would say that a female has the sex drive as much or more than a man. remember it takes both male and female to have sex and if the female doesn't want it then she has the choice not too. just like the abortion a woman does not have to kill the unborn child , which i feel is murder and wrong ,but i wont get into that. abortion would not be necessary if men and women would practice safe sex or wait until they are married to have intercourse but we know that is mainly just a fairy tale dream and does not usually happen these days.

Answer 6

I think there would still be abortions for a few reasons.

1. Sex is natural. No matter who is "in charge", it would still be happening. Since sex would still be happening, unwanted pregnancies would still be happening. Therefore, women would still have to find a way to take care of or get rid of those unwanted pregnancies.
2. Rape would still occur. Rape is about power, not sex and there will always be people wanting power and will hurt others to get it.
3. Just because women are in charge doesn't mean all those women would actually agree on anything. LOL.

Answer 7

Things would definitely be better. If men respected life and the family unit I think things would run a lot smoother overall.

How many women would kill for sport, and then hang the head of a dead carcass on their wall for show.

I think most men need a vasectomy, because they rarely want to be responsible for the lives of the children they bring into the world.

Plus, its safer for men to have a little nip/tuck than it is for women to take fake hormones (with unknown DNA altering side effects) and have (self mutilating, severe depression inducing) abortions.

So men, do society a favor.

Answer 8

God invented abortion for the benefit of women and children. At least my God did. My God loves all people and does not kill a life when a fetus is taken. My God loves his creation so much that he protects the life of the fetus and gives it another chance at life.
The god of the pro life movement kills fetuses, doctors and bombs abortion clinics. You should avoid this god if you can.
God has given woman a special insight into the need for abortion, because it is women that have the emotional ability to understand abortion. Men, who believe in killing understand a god that kills and intimidates more than a God that loves and protects. Therefore, with women in control, abortion would be viewed as God intended. There would probably be fewer abortions and they would not lead to the death of a human soul.

Answer 9

I like sex, I'm not the only one, and birth control accidents happen. So yes, there would still be abortion available. Only it would probably be easier and have less stigma attached.

Answer 10

I don't know exactly how to answer your question, but um.... it's a little odd that you think only men want to have intercourse, but it would be great if men were held to the sam standards