English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Not a star player..not a good solid team, least goals scored...over all I thought it was very boring to watch. I believe this and Italy 90 are right there as the 2 worse World Cup ever.

2006-07-09 10:49:32 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football FIFA World Cup (TM)

10 answers

Yes! It was horrible!

2006-07-09 10:52:30 · answer #1 · answered by POOF 5 · 0 0

Actually,to be objective Germany 2006 is one of the most intense WC ever, great teams ,even the weakest teams were playing their best like Costa Rica ,Angola,Ecuador,some of them make them to 2nd round , it was full of good players , that is the reason for the lack of goals , extremely close and defensive teams, like I said full of Stars , Ronaldo(WC record breaker) , C Ronaldo , Rooney, Ronaldihno, Raul , Max Rodriguez, Crespo, Henry , Zidane and I can go on for hours , one the strongest Argentinean selection ever , same with Italy , Brazil and Spain . Come on! Spain was ultra!!!! they just have a rough teams to played ( its the bloody WC ) the best teams in the World! this WC and WC 98 , one the best ever, best game Argentina-Germany 2006 and Argentina-England 1998 , Great WC , the referees were kind of off sometimes specialy Italia-US games , it was out of control ,but whatever . Italy win so if you dont like it deal with it.
2010 in S Africa , Argentina is taken the WC to South America.
long Live Italia

2006-07-09 11:14:54 · answer #2 · answered by Nestor 4 · 0 0

Of course it was!! There was no star players...yes the're was good talent but no player was a STAR!! You can name players like messi, cristiano ronaldo, zidane, tevez...but no one to say, he made the difference!! No team showed talent on the field, no team was fun to watch (except the 6-0 argentina game). It was a selfish World Cup...instead of team going out to win, they went out no to lose..this is soccer play ,the game don't be afraid to get scored on...all you have to do is score one more than the other team.

2006-07-09 12:25:24 · answer #3 · answered by Liz Y 1 · 0 0

the world cup in general wasn't the worst but i have to admit the championship game was kind of boring i just got done watching it and i wasnt impressed xpecially with the head-butting trick from frances player no class at alll and a slow paced game but im glad italy won!!!

2006-07-09 10:54:09 · answer #4 · answered by sierra 2 · 0 0

Spain superb??? HA HA HA..they will NEVER win the World Cup...never!!! They were never close, they will never be. Just because they best soccer is the world is played there it does not make them a conteder...can't wait 'till South Africa 2010 this World Cup sucked!!

2006-07-09 12:30:52 · answer #5 · answered by gigo_merlo 1 · 0 0

i don't remember worlds cups of the past 20 years

2006-07-09 10:53:23 · answer #6 · answered by darkmagician_007 3 · 0 0

Yes it was worse ever

2006-07-09 10:55:57 · answer #7 · answered by Nick G 2 · 0 0

It wasn't the worst, but it wasn't as exciting as I thought it would have been.

Especially the final.

2006-07-09 14:07:21 · answer #8 · answered by Stoic 4 · 0 0

CMOM PEOPLE IT WAS NOT THAT BAD.
CHEER UP THERE WILL BE ANOTHER ON IN 2010

2006-07-09 10:58:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yep...and the refereeing was crap...

2006-07-09 10:56:03 · answer #10 · answered by fredfeltcher 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers